The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 659

MOTION for Clarification re 653 Order, 654 Order filed by Mark Zuckerberg, The Facebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Sutton, Theresa) (Filed on 11/10/2008) Modified on 11/12/2008 (cv, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SEAN A. LINCOLN (State Bar No. 136387) salincoln@orrick.com I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com MONTE COOPER (State Bar No. 196746) mcooper@orrick.co m THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857) tsutton@orrick.com YVONNE P. GREER (State Bar No. 214072) ygreer@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG, Plaint iffs, v. CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC., WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE CHANG, Defendants. Case No. 5:07-CV-01389-JW [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF, PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 7-11, FOR CLARIFICATION OF NOVEMBER 3, 2008, ORDERS OHS West:260547448.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION 5:07-CV-01389-JW 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: The Court, having considered Plaintiffs' Motion for Administrative Relief for Clarification of November 3, 2008, Orders; the Declaration of Theresa A. Sutton in support thereof, exhibits submitted therewith, and the records on file in this action, hereby orders as follows: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is GRANTED. Honorable James Ware United States District Judge OHS West:260547448.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING ADMIN REQUEST FOR CLARIFICATION 5:07-CV-01389-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?