The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al
Declaration of Thomas B. Mason in Support of 731 Objection, to and Motion to Strike, ConnectU's Renewed Request For Hearing Date Relating to Production of ConnectU's Documents filed byDivya Narendra, Cameron Winklevoss, Tyler Winklevoss. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C)(Related document(s) 731 ) (SeLegue, Sean) (Filed on 12/23/2009)
HOGE, FENTON JONES &APPEL, INC.
Serving Northern CaSlornia since 952
Attorneys at Law
September 11,2009 VIA FACSIMILE AND MAIL Thomas B. Mason Zuckcrman Spaeder LLP 1800 M. Street, NW, Suite 1000 Washington, DC 200365802 Re: ConnectU, Inc., et al. v. Facebook, Inc., et al Our File No.: 80696
Dear Mr. Mason: This letter serves to respond to your letter dated September 8, 2009, which you sent on tate behalf of your client, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner. In your letter you s new ConnectU under Judge Ware's order that "[t]he documents that need to be provided to therefore have already been provided to Facebook by Finnegan." At your earliest convenience, please provide us with the following: 1. An index of all ConnectU documents that Finnegan previously produced to Facebook; and An index of all ConnectU documents that Finnegan has but which Finnegen believes it is not obligated to produce based on Judge Ware's order.
Your client's production of these two indeyes will gteatly nssist ConnectU and Finnegan when we appear before Magistrate Judge James to address the issues relating to ConnectU's documents. Sincerely, HOGE, FENTON, JONES & APPEL, INC.
Alison P. Buchanan
San Jose Office
60 Scuth Market Street, Suite 400, Sar Jose. Caiforr.u 95i 3-2396 wwwMogefenton.com fax 408287 2583 phone 408.287.950 j
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?