The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al

Filing 771

RESPONSE (re 769 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) Opposition to Administrative Request to File 15 Page Oversized Brief filed byThe Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Chatterjee, Indra) (Filed on 10/27/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com MONTE COOPER (State Bar No. 196746) mcooper@orrick.com THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857) tsutton@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: 650-614-7400 Facsimile: 650-614-7401 Attorneys for Plaintiffs THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG, 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 17 18 CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC., WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE CHANG, Case No. 5:07-CV-01389-JW DECLARATION OF I. NEEL CHATTERJEE IN SUPPORT OF OPPOSITION TO ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO FILE OVERSIZED ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO PAY LIENHOLDERS AND COMPLETE THE EXCHANGE OF CONSIDERATION Judge: Honorable James Ware 19 Defendants. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CHATTERJEE DECL. ISO OPP. TO ADMIN REQUEST TO FILE OVERSIZED REQUEST 5:07-CV-01389-JW 1 I, I. Neel Chatterjee, declare as follows: 2 1. I am a partner at the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, counsel for 3 Plaintiffs Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg in this action, and a member of the Bar of the state 4 of California. I make this declaration in support of plaintiffs’ Opposition to Messrs. Winklevoss 5 and Narendra’s Administrative Request to File an Oversized Brief in Support of Administrative 6 Request to Pay Lienholders and Complete the Exchange of Consideration (Dkt. No. 769). I make 7 this declaration of my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would 8 testify competently to the truth of the matters set forth herein. 9 10 11 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the redacted oversized brief the ConnectU Founders are seeking leave to file. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the complaint filed 12 (without Exhibits), and currently pending, in Chang v. Winklevoss, Case No. 09-5397, pending in 13 Superior Court Department, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 14 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of an October 25, 2011, 15 letter from Nicholas Rosenberg, counsel to Wayne Chang in the Chang v. Winklevoss matter 16 referenced above, to Sean O’Shea and Michael Petrella, counsel to Messrs. Winklevoss and 17 Narendra in the Chang matter. 18 5. Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the ConnectU Founders’ 19 Motion for Discovery Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), filed on August 19, 2011, in ConnectU, Inc. v. 20 Facebook, Inc., Case No. 07-cv-10593 DPW (District of Massachusetts). 21 6. Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the ConnectU Founders’ 22 Motion for Access to Pleadings and Discovery Files [to support a Rule 60(b) motion], filed on 23 August 25, 2011, in ConnectU, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 07-cv-10593 DPW (District of 24 Massachusetts). 25 26 I declare the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this 27th day of October 2011, at Menlo Park, California. 27 /s/ I. Neel Chatterjee /s/ I. Neel Chatterjee 28 -1- CHATTERJEE DECL. ISO OPP. TO ADMIN REQUEST TO FILE OVERSIZED REQUEST 5:07-CV-01389-JW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?