The Facebook, Inc. v. Connectu, Inc et al
Filing
771
RESPONSE (re 769 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal ) Opposition to Administrative Request to File 15 Page Oversized Brief filed byThe Facebook, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Exhibit 1, # 3 Exhibit 2, # 4 Exhibit 3, # 5 Exhibit 4, # 6 Exhibit 5)(Chatterjee, Indra) (Filed on 10/27/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (State Bar No. 173985)
nchatterjee@orrick.com
MONTE COOPER (State Bar No. 196746)
mcooper@orrick.com
THERESA A. SUTTON (State Bar No. 211857)
tsutton@orrick.com
ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP
1000 Marsh Road
Menlo Park, CA 94025
Telephone:
650-614-7400
Facsimile:
650-614-7401
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK ZUCKERBERG
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
12
13
THE FACEBOOK, INC. and MARK
ZUCKERBERG,
14
Plaintiffs,
15
v.
16
17
18
CONNECTU, INC. (formerly known as
CONNECTU, LLC), PACIFIC
NORTHWEST SOFTWARE, INC.,
WINSTON WILLIAMS, and WAYNE
CHANG,
Case No. 5:07-CV-01389-JW
DECLARATION OF I. NEEL
CHATTERJEE IN SUPPORT OF
OPPOSITION TO ADMINISTRATIVE
REQUEST TO FILE OVERSIZED
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUEST TO
PAY LIENHOLDERS AND
COMPLETE THE EXCHANGE OF
CONSIDERATION
Judge: Honorable James Ware
19
Defendants.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CHATTERJEE DECL. ISO OPP. TO ADMIN
REQUEST TO FILE OVERSIZED REQUEST
5:07-CV-01389-JW
1
I, I. Neel Chatterjee, declare as follows:
2
1.
I am a partner at the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, counsel for
3
Plaintiffs Facebook, Inc. and Mark Zuckerberg in this action, and a member of the Bar of the state
4
of California. I make this declaration in support of plaintiffs’ Opposition to Messrs. Winklevoss
5
and Narendra’s Administrative Request to File an Oversized Brief in Support of Administrative
6
Request to Pay Lienholders and Complete the Exchange of Consideration (Dkt. No. 769). I make
7
this declaration of my own personal knowledge and, if called as a witness, I could and would
8
testify competently to the truth of the matters set forth herein.
9
10
11
2.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of the redacted oversized
brief the ConnectU Founders are seeking leave to file.
3.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of the complaint filed
12
(without Exhibits), and currently pending, in Chang v. Winklevoss, Case No. 09-5397, pending in
13
Superior Court Department, Commonwealth of Massachusetts.
14
4.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of an October 25, 2011,
15
letter from Nicholas Rosenberg, counsel to Wayne Chang in the Chang v. Winklevoss matter
16
referenced above, to Sean O’Shea and Michael Petrella, counsel to Messrs. Winklevoss and
17
Narendra in the Chang matter.
18
5.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of the ConnectU Founders’
19
Motion for Discovery Under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b), filed on August 19, 2011, in ConnectU, Inc. v.
20
Facebook, Inc., Case No. 07-cv-10593 DPW (District of Massachusetts).
21
6.
Attached hereto as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of the ConnectU Founders’
22
Motion for Access to Pleadings and Discovery Files [to support a Rule 60(b) motion], filed on
23
August 25, 2011, in ConnectU, Inc. v. Facebook, Inc., Case No. 07-cv-10593 DPW (District of
24
Massachusetts).
25
26
I declare the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Executed this
27th day of October 2011, at Menlo Park, California.
27
/s/ I. Neel Chatterjee /s/
I. Neel Chatterjee
28
-1-
CHATTERJEE DECL. ISO OPP. TO ADMIN
REQUEST TO FILE OVERSIZED REQUEST
5:07-CV-01389-JW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?