Almeida v. Google, Inc.

Filing 41

MOTION to Relate Case [NOTICE OF MOTION AND ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED] filed by Google, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Silbert, David) (Filed on 2/22/2010)

Download PDF
Almeida v. Google, Inc. Doc. 41 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CLRB HANSON INDUSTRIES, LLC d/b/a INDUSTRIAL PRINTING, and HOWARD STERN, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, vs. GOOGLE, INC., Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO: C05-03649 JW NOTICE OF NEED FOR ADR PHONE CONFERENCE Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and that they: x have not yet reached an agreement to an ADR process x request an Early Settlement Conference with a Magistrate Judge Date of Case Management Conference April 3, 2006 The following counsel will participate in the ADR phone conference: Name Lester L. Levy Michele F. Raphael Wolf Popper LLP Party Representing CLRB Hanson Industries, LLC d/b/a Industrial Printing and Howard Stern Google, Inc. Phone No. (212) 759-4600 E-Mail Address David T. Biderman Judith B. Gitterman Perkins Coie LLP (415) 344-7000 (310) 788-9900 Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR Local Rule 3-5 require that lead trial counsel participate in a telephone conference with a member of the ADR Legal Staff before the Case Management Conference. The ADR Unit ( will notify you of the date and time of your phone conference. Dated: March 9, 2006 Dated: March 9, 2006 Doc. 152032 /s/ Attorney for Plaintiff /s/ Attorney for Defendant

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?