Almeida v. Google, Inc.

Filing 6

Declaration of Alyse D. Bertenthal In Support of Defendant Google's Administrative Motion to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related Pursuant to Civ Local Rule 3-12 by Google, Inc. re 5 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C) (Bertenthal, Alyse) (Filed on 6/27/2008) Text modified on 6/27/2008, incorrect event type used (bw, COURT STAFF).

Almeida v. Google, Inc.

Doc. 6

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

KEKER & VAN NEST, LLP DARALYN J. DURIE - #169825 DAVID J. SILBERT - #173128 RYAN M. KENT - #220441 ALYSE BERTENTHAL - #253012 710 Sansome Street San Francisco, CA 94111-1704 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

DAVID ALMEIDA, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware corporation; and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants.

Case No. C 08-02088 HRL DECLARATION OF ALYSE D. BERTENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-12

I, Alyse D. Bertenthal, declare: 1. I am an attorney licensed to practice law in the State of California. I am an

associate with Keker & Van Nest, LLP, counsel for Google, Inc. ("Google"), defendant in the above-entitled action. I submit this declaration in support of Defendant's Administrative Motion To Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related Pursuant To Civil Local Rule 3-12. I have personal knowledge of the facts stated herein and, if called as a witness, I would testify competently thereto. 2. Attached hereto as Exhibit A is a true and correct copy of the April 22, 2008 1
DECLARATION OF ALYSE D. BERTENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-12 CASE NO. C 08-020888 HRL Dockets.Justia.com

420172.01

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Complaint filed in Almeida v. Google, Inc., Case No. C 08-02088. 3. Attached hereto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of the June 24, 2005

Complaint filed in Clicks Defense, Inc. v. Google, Inc., Case No. C 05-02579. 4. Attached hereto as Exhibit C is a true and correct copy of the November 22, 2005

Second Amended Complaint filed in Steven Mizera v. Google, Inc., Case No. 05-02885. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was executed on June 27, 2008, at San Francisco, California. /s/ Alyse Bertenthal ALYSE D. BERTENTHAL Attorneys for Defendant GOOGLE, INC.

2
DECLARATION OF ALYSE D. BERTENTHAL IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT GOOGLE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 3-12 CASE NO. C 08-020888 HRL

420172.01