Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 124

NOTICE OF MANUAL FILING of Opposition to 42 MOTION to Dismiss , Transfer, or Stay - filed by Google Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Denying Defendants' Mtn to Dismiss)(Walsh, Thomas) (Filed on 7/24/2009) Modified text on 8/3/2009 (dhm, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. CV08-03172-RMW [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER, OR STAY UNDER THE FIRST-TO-FILE RULE, UNDER RULE 12(B)(2) FOR LACK OF PERSONAL JURISDICTION, AND UNDER RULE 12(B)(1) FOR LACK OF SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION Hearing Date: August 21, 2009 Hearing Time: 9:00 am Courtroom: 6 (4th Floor) Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! INC., 13 IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and LYCOS, INC. 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v. 16 L. DANIEL EGGER, 17 SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 18 Defendants 19 20 . 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PROPOSED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER OR STAY Case No. C-08-03172-RMW 1 Pending before the Court is Defendants L. Daniel Egger, Software Rights Archive, LLC, 2 and Site Technologies, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss, Transfer, or Stay under the First-to-File Rule, 3 under Rule 12(b)(2) for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction, and under Rule 12(b)(1) for Lack of Subject 4 Matter Jurisdiction ("Motion to Dimiss, Transfer, or Stay"). 5 Having considered the motion, the response in opposition thereto, any reply thereto, the 6 evidence of record, and arguments of counsel, the Court hereby DENIES the Motion to Dismiss, 7 Transfer, or Stay. 8 9 10 Dated: ________, 2009 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 PROPOSED ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS, TRANSFER OR STAY IT IS SO ORDERED. __________________________________________ Hon. Ronald Whyte UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. C-08-03172-RMW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?