Google Inc. et al v. Egger et al

Filing 90

Reply Memorandum re 63 MOTION to Quash Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition and (2) Opposition to Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Compel Production of Documents filed bySoftware Rights Archive LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Kaplan, Lee) (Filed on 3/27/2009)

1 Lee L. Kaplan (Texas Bar No. 11094400) 2 Kristen L. McKeever (Texas Bar No. 24030775) 3 Raj Duvvuri (Texas Bar No. 24054185) 4 (admitted pro hac vice)
Houston, TX 77002 [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail]

5 700 Louisiana Street, Suite 2300 6 Telephone: [phone] 11 12
Facsimile: [phone]

Smyser Kaplan & Veselka, L.L.P.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION GOOGLE INC., AOL LLC, YAHOO! Case No. CV08-03172RMW [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC'S (1) REPLY IN FURTHER SUPPORT OF ITS MOTION TO QUASH PLAINTIFFS' 30(b)(6) NOTICE OF DEPOSITION AND (2) OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS' CROSSMOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS HEARING REQUESTED

13 INC., IAC SEARCH & MEDIA, INC., and LYCOS, INC. 14 15 16
v. L. DANIEL EGGER, SOFTWARE Plaintiffs

17 RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC, and SITE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendants

[PROPOSED] ORDER ON SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC'S REPLY AND OPPOSITION CASE NO. CV08-03172 1

1 2

[PROPOSED] ORDER For good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT after reviewing Defendants'

3 Motion to Quash Plaintiffs' 30(b)(6) Notice of Deposition to Defendant Software Rights 4 Archive, LLC, Plaintiffs' Cross-Motion to Compel Production of Documents from Defendant 5 Software Rights Archive, LLC, all Responses and Replies to both motions, and the evidence 6 presented, the Court finds that the Motion to Quash (Docket No. 63) is GRANTED and the 7 Motion to Compel (Docket No. 72) is DENIED. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED] ORDER ON SOFTWARE RIGHTS ARCHIVE, LLC'S REPLY AND OPPOSITION CASE NO. CV08-03172 2

Dated: _____________________, 2009.

By: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte United States District Judge