Facebook, Inc. v. Studivz, Ltd et al

Filing 161

Memorandum in Opposition re 159 MOTION to Quash Motion for Protective Order Quashing Facebooks Subpoenas Served on Third Parties Facebook's Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoenas filed byFacebook, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Avalos, Julio) (Filed on 5/26/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 I. NEEL CHATTERJEE (STATE BAR NO. 173985) nchatterjee@orrick.com JULIO C. AVALOS (STATE BAR NO. 255350) javalo s@orrick.com ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 1000 Marsh Road Menlo Park, CA 94025 Telephone: +1-650-614-7400 Facsimile: +1-650-614-7401 THOMAS J. GRAY (STATE BAR NO. 191411) tgray@orrick.co m ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP 4 Park Plaza Suite 1600 Irvine, CA 92614-2558 Telephone: +1-949-567-6700 Facsimile: 949-567 6710 Attorneys for Plaintiff FACEBOOK, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION FACEBOOK, INC., Plaint iff, v. STUDIVZ LTD., HOTLZBRINCK NETWORKS GmBH, HOLTZBRINCK VENTURES GmBH, DENNIS BEMMANN, MICHAEL BREHM, and DOES 1-25, Defendants. Case No. 5:08-cv-03468 JF [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION TO QUASH THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS Complaint Filed: July 18, 2008 [ P R O P O S E D ] ORDER D E N Y I N G M O T I O N T O QUASH THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS CASE NO.: 5:08-CV-03468 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: DENIED. The Court, having considered StudiVZ Ltd.'s motion for protective order quashing third-party subpoenas, Facebook, Inc.'s motion in opposition thereto, as well as the records on file in this action, hereby orders as follows: StudiVZ Ltd.'s Motion to Quash Facebook's third-party subpoenas IS HEREBY IT IS SO ORDERED. Honorable Howard Lloyd United States Magistrate Judge -1- [ P R O P O S E D ] ORDER D E N Y I N G M O T I O N T O QUASH THIRD-PARTY SUBPOENAS CASE NO.: 5:08-CV-03468

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?