eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 124

Declaration of Colleen M. Kennedy in Support of 123 MOTION to Compel eBay Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Compel Responses to Requests for Production, Interrogatories and Requests for Admission; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed byeBay Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23)(Related document(s) 123 ) (Kennedy, Colleen) (Filed on 9/22/2009)

Download PDF
eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc. et al Doc. 124 Att. 16 Case5:08-cv-04052-JF Document124-17 Filed09/22/09 Page1 of 3 EXHIBIT 17 Dockets.Justia.com Case5:08-cv-04052-JF Document124-17 Filed09/22/09 Page2 of 3 o Q'MELVENY & MYERS LLP BEIJING BRUSSELS CENTURY CITY HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEWPORT BEACH OUR FILE NUMBER Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3823 TELEPHONE FACSIMILE NEW YORK SHANGHAI SILICON VALLEY SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. (415) 984-87 (415) 984.871 www.omm.com September 16, 2009 ::34,94 8-0 0 0 7 WRITER'S DIRECT DIAL VIA FACSIMILE AND MAIL Steve Priolo Rackspace US, Inc. 9725 Datapoint Drive, Ste. 100 San Antonio, TX 78229 (4 1 5) 9 84- 88 :: 6 WRITER'S E-MAIL ADDRESS ckennedy@omm.com Re: Dear Mr. Priolo: eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc., et al., Case No. CV-OB-4052 JF I write regarding the conversation we had on Friday, September 11,2001 regarding the response by Rackspace US, Inc. ("Rackspace") to the Amended Subpoena served by eBay on June 9, 2009 (the "Amended Subpoena"). During our conversation, you advised me that Rackspace produced approximately twenty pages of documents to Leo Presiado on or about September 9, 2009. You advised that these documents constitute billing records and the agreement and renewals memorializing the relationship between Rackspace and one or more of the Defendants in the above-captioned litigation. You also stated that Rackspace currently has in its possession multiple drives containing data belonging to Defendants, which mayor may not be responsive to the Amended Subpoena. You stated that, because the data residing on the drives belongs to Defendants and because Defendants have full access to that data, Defendants-not Rackspace-are responsible for any production of such data to eBay. As a courtesy to you, and without waiving eBay's right to seek to compel Rackspace to produce directly all responsive materials in the future, eBay will not yet move to compel Rackspace's performance and will continue its efforts to obtain the responsive materials from Defendants. eBay does not, however, release Rackspace from its obligation to produce responsive documents and formally requests that Rackspace continue to preserve any and all of Defendants' data in Rackspace's possession that might be responsive to the Amended Subpoena. Please be advised that if Rackspace does not maintain its possession of and preserve the integrity Case5:08-cv-04052-JF Document124-17 Q'MELVENY Filed09/22/09 Page3 of 3 & MYERS LLP Steve Priolo, September 16, 2009 - Page 2 of all potentially responsive data, eBay will view that as a violation of the Amended Subpoena and will seek appropriate judicial relief. If eBay later concludes that it is able to release Rackspace from its obligations under the Amended Subpoena, I will so inform you in writing. If this letter does not accurately reflect our conversation, or if you have any questions or concerns, please let me know. Very truly yours, tl&t~ Colleen M. Kennedy for O'MELVENY & MYERS LLP cc: David R. Eberhart, Esq. Patrick K. McClellan, Esq. Leo J. Presiado, Esq. Stewart H. Foreman, Esq.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?