eBay Inc. v. Digital Point Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 82

MOTION to Transfer Case filed by Digital Point Solutions, Inc., Shawn Hogan. Motion Hearing set for 6/26/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Ross M. Campbell, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Certificate of Service)(Campbell, Ross) (Filed on 5/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 O r d e r Granting Defendants' Motion to Transfer 1 Case No. CV 08-04052 JF PVT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION EBAY, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) DIGITAL POINT SOLUTIONS, INC., SHAWN ) ) HOGAN, KESSLER'S FLYING CIRCUS, THUNDERWOOD HOLDINGS, INC., TODD ) ) DUNNING, DUNNING ENTERPRISE, INC., BRIAN DUNNING, BRIANDUNNING.COM, ) ) and Does 1-20, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No. CV 08-04052 JF PVT [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS DIGITAL POINT SOLUTIONS, INC. AND SHAWN HOGAN'S MOTION TO TRANSFER TO THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA The motion of Defendants DIGITAL POINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SHAWN HOGAN for transfer of this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1404(a) came on regularly for hearing before this Court on June 26, 2009. The parties were represented by their respective counsel of record. After considering the moving and opposition papers, arguments of counsel and all other matters presented to the Court, the Court HEREBY GRANTS the motion to transfer and DIRECTS the Clerk to 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 transfer this action to the United States District Court for the Central District of California. DATED: ____________________, 2009 ______________________________ HON. JEREMY FOGEL United States District Judge O r d e r Granting Defendants' Motion to Transfer 2 Case No. CV 08-04052 JF PVT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?