Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
13
MOTION to Dismiss Defendant Apple Inc.'s Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support Thereof filed by Apple, Inc.. Motion Hearing set for 4/24/2009 09:00 AM in Courtroom 3, 5th Floor, San Jose. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Counts, Thomas) (Filed on 2/27/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
DAVID M. WALSH (SB# 120761) davidwalsh@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 515 South Flower Street Twenty-Fifth Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071 Telephone: (213) 683-6000 Facsimile: (213) 627-0705 THOMAS A. COUNTS (SB# 148051) tomcounts@paulhastings.com T. LEE KISSMAN (SB# 233434) leekissman@paulhastings.com PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP 55 Second Street Twenty-Fourth Floor San Francisco, CA 94105-3441 Telephone: (415) 856-7000 Facsimile: (415) 856-7100 Attorneys for Defendant APPLE, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION
ARAM HOVSEPIAN, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. APPLE INC., Defendant.
CASE NO. C 08-05788 JF [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS Complaint Filed: December 31, 2008 Hon. Jeremy Fogel
Case No. C 08-05788 JF
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Defendant Apple Inc.'s ("Apple") Motion to Dismiss came on for hearing before this Court on April 24, 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The Court, having considered the papers on the motion and the law, as well as arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing, orders that Apple's Motion to Dismiss is HEREBY GRANTED, as follows: Plaintiff's Class Action Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: __________, 2009
By: HON. JEREMY FOGEL
LEGAL_US_W # 61183285.1
Case No. C 08-05788 JF
-2-
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING APPLE INC.'S MOTION TO DISMISS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?