Hovsepian v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 1686

Download PDF
ovsepian v. Apple, Inc. Do UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) TONY FOSTER ) Plaintiff(s) ) ) C 05-03635 MEJ -v) ) ORDER SETTING INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CA STATE AUTOMOBILE ) CONFERENCE Defendant(s) ) ______________________________) IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Honorable Maria-Elena James. When serving the complaint or notice of removal, the plaintiff or removing defendant must serve on all other parties a copy of this order, the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California," the Notice of Assignment to United States Magistrate Judge for Trial, and all other documents specified in Civil Local Rule 4-2. Counsel must comply with the case schedule listed below unless the Court otherwise orders. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is assigned to the Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Multi-Option Program governed by ADR Local Rule 3. Counsel and clients must familiarize themselves with that rule and with the handbook entitled "Dispute Resolution Procedures in the Northern District of California." CASE SCHEDULE [ADR MULTI-OPTION PROGRAM] Date Event Governing Rule ------------------------------------------------------------------------09/09/2005 Complaint filed 12/22/2005 Last day to meet and confer re initial disclosures, early settlement, ADR process selection, and discovery plan 12/22/2005 Last day to file Joint ADR Certification with Stipulation to ADR process or Notice of Need for ADR Phone Conference 01/05/2006 Last day to complete initial disclosures or state objection in Rule 26(f) Report, file/serve Case Management Statement, and file/serve Rule 26(f) Report 01/12/2006 Case Management Conference in Ctrm B, 15th Fl, SF at 10:00 AM FRCivP 26(f) & ADR LR 3-5 Civil L.R. 16-8 FRCivP 26(a)(1) Civil L.R.16-9 H Civil L.R. 16-10 Dockets.Jus

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?