Viacom International Inc. et al v. YouTube, Inc. et al

Filing 9

Response of Non-Party BayTSP to Defendant YouTube's Motion to Compel Production of Documents byBayTSP, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hemminger, Steven) (Filed on 11/18/2008)

1 Steven D. Hemminger (State Bar No. 110665) ALSTON & BIRD LLP 2 Two Palo Alto Square 3 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Palo Alto, CA 94306-2112 4 Tel.: [phone] Fax: [phone] Email: [e-mail] 6 7 Attorney for Nonparty BayTSP, Inc. 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 v. Viaco m Internat ional Inc., et al., Plaint iffs, Case No. 08-MC-80211-JF-PVT [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT YOUTUBE'S MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

16 YouTube, Inc. et al., 17 18 19 The Football Association Premier League 20 Limited, et al., 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
[PROPOSED ] ORD ER D ENYING DEFEND ANT YOUT UBE'S MOTION TO CO MPEL PROD UCTION O F DOCUMENTS

Defendants.

Plaint iffs, v. YouTube, Inc. et al., Defendants.

Date: Time: Dept.: Judge:

December 9, 2008 10:00 a.m. Courtroom 5, 4th Floor Patricia V. Trumbull

CASE NO. 08-MC -80211 JF (PVTx)

1

Having considered Defendant YouTube's Motion to Compel Production of Docu-

2 ments, BayTSP's Response to Defendant YouTube's Motion to Compel Production of 3 Documents, and all supporting documents, the pleadings and papers on file with the Court, 4 and good cause appearing therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant YouTube's 5 Motion to Compel Production of Documents is Denied. 6 7 The Court is denying YouTube's motion and the Court hereby Orders: (i) YouTube's subpoena duces tecum to BayTSP be limited to include only Plaint iffs

8 and their subsidiaries; 9 (ii) YouTube's subpoena duces tecum to BayTSP be limited to exclude BayTSP's

10 proprietary so ftware and BayTSP's nonpart y clients; 11 (iii) Production by making responsive documents available for YouTube's inspect ion

12 on two computer terminals at Alston & Bird LLP's offices located at Two Palo Alto Square, 13 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400, Palo Alto, CA., shall be sufficient; 14 (iv) Documents responsive to the limited scope allowed by this Order shall be made

15 available for inspect ion on a rolling-basis terminat ing two weeks after the totalit y o f 16 responsive non-privileged documents has been made available; 17 (v) Inadvertent production documents protected under the attorney-client privilege,

18 work-product protection, or any other applicable privilege or protection, despite reasonable 19 efforts to prescreen such documents prior to production, will not waive the applicable 20 privilege or protection, and YouTube will return such inadvertently produced Discovery 21 Material prompt ly after learning o f its inadvertent production; and 22 (vi) Should YouTube indicate it seeks copies of documents made available for

23 inspection, electronic and paper copies such documents shall be provided to YouTube at you 24 YouTube's expense. 25 26 Dated: November ____, 2008 27 28
[PROPOSED ] ORD ER D ENYING DEFEND ANT YOUT UBE'S MOTION TO CO MPEL PROD UCTION O F DOCUMENTS

____________________________

Patricia V. Trumball Magistrate Judge
1
CASE NO. 08-MC -80211 JF (PVTx)