Scott v. Antioch Police Department et al
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO RESPONS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 1/27/12. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDJUAN C. SCOTT,
OFFICER JOHN FORTNER, et al.,
No. C 09-0720 LHK (PR)
PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an amended civil rights complaint
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 9, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for an
extension of time to respond to Defendants’ discovery requests. Plaintiff’s responses were due
January 9, 2012. On January 20, 2012, Defendants filed a motion to compel responses to their
discovery requests because Plaintiff still had not yet complied.
Plaintiff is directed to file a response to Defendants’ motion to compel within twenty
days of the filing date of this order. Failure to respond may result in sanctions, up to and
potentially including dismissal of this action.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Order Directing Plaintiff to Respond
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?