Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.

Filing 319

RESPONSE (re 313 MOTION to Compel Elan Employee Depositions in N.D. Cal ) filed byElan Microelectronics Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A)(DeBruine, Sean) (Filed on 7/1/2011)

Download PDF
APPENDIX A Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Topics relating to Apple’s claims only Topics relating to Elan’s claims or both parties’claims Topics that are completely redundant to ITC topics and Elan will not be producing a witness Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topic 4: 1. The design, development, structure, function, and operation of Elan Touchpads or touchscreens that have been sold or offered for sale in, or imported into, the United States. The research, design, development, implementation, and testing of any Elan product or technology (including, but not limited to, any product, apparatus, method, invention, system, service, prototype, drawing, design, schematic, invention, embodiment or item) allegedly covered by the ‘352 Patent, including, but not limited to, the identity of each person who participated in or has knowledge of the research, design, development, implementation, and testing; and the identity, name, design, features, function, structure, and operation of any such products or technology. Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topic 6: 2. The sales and marketing of Elan Touchpads or touchscreens that have Any attempts by Elan, persons employed by been sold or offered for sale in, or Elan, or persons acting on behalf of Elan to imported into, the United States, including market, sell, or otherwise commercialize LEGAL02/32717927v1 Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Mr. Maco Tang on November 22, 2011 Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic Yes; relates to Apple claims Elan designee: Mr. Eric Yang (possibly one additional witness) Mr. Ian Chung, Nov 15-16, 2010 Yes; relates to Apple claims Elan designee: Mr. Ian Chung (possibly one Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics without limitation, all efforts to sell, market or promote the inclusion or use of Elan Touchpads or touchscreens in products sold, offered for sale, imported, or intended for sale, offer for sale, importation or use in the United States. any product or prototype covered by the '352 Patent including, but not limited to, the first demonstration of such product, the first use of such product, the first sale or offer to sell or license of such product, the date(s) when Elan began marketing, offering for sale, or selling such product or prototype, the identity of each person involved in such marketing or selling, and Documents relating to any of the foregoing. Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topic 6 (see above) 3. Elan’s communications and contacts with third parties relating to the actual or potential supply or inclusion of Elan Touchpads or touchscreens in products that have been sold or offered for sale in, or imported into, the United States. 4. The transfer or acquisition of rights to or in US Patent No. 5,825,352, including without limitation, all agreements by or between Logitech, Inc., K-Tech Devices Corp., Elantech Devices Corp. and/or Elan. Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topic 7: 7. The facts and circumstances concerning Elan’s acquisition of the '352 Patent Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topic 7: 5. The merger or acquisition of K-Tech Devices Corp. with or by Elantech 7. The facts and circumstances concerning -2LEGAL02/32717927v1 Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic additional witness) Mr. Ian Chung, Nov 15-16, 2010. Mr. Wayne Chang, Nov 15 and 16, 2010 Mr. Wayne Chang, Nov 15 and 16, 2010 Yes; relates to Apple claims Elan designee: Mr. Ian Chung (possibly one additional witness) No. This Topic is completely redundant to the testimonies already taken in the ITC Action. No. This Topic is completely redundant to the testimonies already Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Devices Corp. Elan's acquisition of the '352 Patent 7. The conception and reduction to practice of US Patent No. 7,274,353. N/A Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic taken in the ITC Action N/A Yes; relates to Elan claims; however, will be a very short subject matter deposition since no 353 patent inventors are still employed by Elan. Elan designee: Mr. Wayne Chang First Set of 30(b)(6) Notice, Topics 6-9 8. Licensing or efforts to license US Patent No. 5,825,352, US Patent No. 7,274,353 and related patents, including without limitation, the nature, terms, and scope of any license or offer to license; all efforts to license and all negotiations related to the licensing; discussions or communications relating to possible business agreements or arrangements relating to or arising out of licensing discussions; and discussions or 6. The entities with whom Elan has discussed or negotiated a license or settlement agreement including or otherwise relating to the '352 Patent but which have not entered into a license or settlement agreement, or have only entered into a license or settlement agreement of narrower scope than proposed by Elan, and the information of which Elan is aware relating to why those entities have not entered into license or settlement -3LEGAL02/32717927v1 Mr. Wayne Chang, Nov 15 and 16, 2010 No. This Topic is completely redundant to the testimonies already taken in the ITC Action. Further Elan has responded in its interrogatory response that it has not licensed or even attempted to license the 353 patent. Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue communications with prospective licensees, including but not limited to demand letters, notice letters, presentations and claim charts. Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics agreements of the full scope proposed by Elan. 7. Elan's communications with any entity relating to asserting or enforcing the '352 Patent or other patents in its portfolio, including cease and desist letters and claim charts. 9. All facts and circumstances related to any licenses and licensing negotiations (including, but not limited to, evaluating, offering, requesting, pursuing, and executing licenses) including or otherwise concerning the '352 Patent, including, but not limited to, the identity of each person involved in or with knowledge of any license or licensing negotiations, the facts and circumstances of any license or licensing negotiations, Communications made relating to licenses or licensing negotiations (including Communications relating to the scope, infringement, validity, or enforceability of, or prior art to, the '352 Patent, as well as any royalty reports), the outcome of any licensing negotiations, the terms of any license agreements resulting from any -4LEGAL02/32717927v1 Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic licensing negotiations (including the name and location of the licensee and the amount of royalties or other type of compensation paid), products licensed, dates and volumes of sales of licensed products, the revenue, gross margin, net profit, or loss attributable to any licenses, all facts related to any action Elan has used to enforce any license, all facts related to Elan's investments to exploit the '352 Patent through licensing, and Documents relating to any of the foregoing. 9. The settlement of any claim relating to US Patent No. 5,825,352, US Patent No. 7,274,353 and related patents, including without limitation, settlement negotiations. See above, see also, First Set of 30(b)(6) Topic Nos. 4, 5, 8: 4. Any negotiations related to licenses or potential licenses encompassing the '352 Patent. 5. The terms of any licenses or draft licenses encompassing the '352 Patent. 8. The settlement and license agreements between Elan and Synaptics, Elan and Averatec, and Elan and Prostar, the history of those agreements before and -5LEGAL02/32717927v1 Mr. Wayne Chang, Nov 15 and 16, 2010 No. This Topic is completely redundant to the testimonies already taken in the ITC Action. Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic after their execution, and any discussions or efforts to renegotiate those agreements that have occurred or have been proposed or that Elan anticipates. 10. The revenues, sales, costs, profits, margins, expenses and other financial information for the Elan Touchpads or touchscreens that have been sold or offered for sale in, or imported into, the United States. Apple 1st Set of 30(b)(6) Deposition Topic No 5. 11. Elan’s knowledge of Apple’s alleged infringement of each asserted claim of US Patent No. 5,825,352 and US Patent No. 7,274,353. Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topic 9: 5. The identity and the price, cost, and any other numerical valuation of touchpads and touchscreens allegedly covered by the '352 Patent manufactured by, for, or under authorization from Elan, including the relative value of these components as compared to the products that contain them. 9. Elan's efforts to identify Apple products that Elan contends infringe the '352 Patent, any information or evaluation gathered or considered by Elan in its decision to accuse Apple of infringement, any reverse engineering or tests of Apple products or components performed or requested by Elan, the facts, circumstances, -6LEGAL02/32717927v1 Mr. Ian Chung; Nov. 15-16. Yes, relates to both parties’ claims. Elan designee: Mr. Ian Chung and Ms. Liling Lai (limited to the authentication and explanation of the sales spreadsheets) Mr. Wayne Chang, Nov 15 and 16, 2010 Yes, relates to Elan claim; however the subject matter of the deposition will be short and the responsive and non-privileged information has been provided via interrogatory responses. Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California and date(s) of Elan's first awareness of Apple's alleged infringement, the identity of each person who has knowledge of any of the foregoing, and Documents relating to any of the foregoing. 12. Elan’s decision to bring this action against Apple, including, but not limited to, Elan’s decision to assert each of US Patent No. 5,825,352, US Patent No. 7,274,353 and related patents against Apple. Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Notice Topics 9 and 11: 9. Elan's efforts to identify Apple products that Elan contends infringe the '352 Patent, any information or evaluation gathered or considered by Elan in its decision to accuse Apple of infringement, any reverse engineering or tests of Apple products or components performed or requested by Elan, the facts, circumstances, and date(s) of Elan's first awareness of Apple's alleged infringement, the identity of each person who has knowledge of any of the foregoing, and Documents relating to any of the foregoing. 14. Any and all analyses or opinions conducted by, at the request of, or on behalf of Elan on the validity or invalidity, enforceability or unenforceability, -7LEGAL02/32717927v1 Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic Elan designee: Mr. Wayne Chang Same as above Same as above Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic infringement or non-infringement, patentability, or scope of the '352 Patent or any claim thereof, including, but not limited to, all advice of counsel regarding the enforceability of the '352 Patent upon which Elan may rely for any purpose in this Investigation. 13. All efforts by or on behalf of Elan to satisfy the marking requirements of 35 U.S.C. § 287 for each of US Patent No. 5,825,352, US Patent No. 7,274,353 and related patents. N/A N/A 14. Elan’s first awareness of the Apple patents-in-suit and actions taken in response, including without limitation, any study, investigation or analysis of the Apple patents-in-suit or related patents. N/A N/A -8LEGAL02/32717927v1 Yes, relates to Elan’s claim; however the subject matter of the deposition will be short and the responsive information has been provided via interrogatory responses. Elan designee: TBD Yes, relates to Apple’s claim; the subject matter of the deposition will be short and the responsive and non-privileged information has been provided via interrogatory responses. Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic Elan designee: Mr. Wayne Chang 15. The demonstration, use, and identity of Elan products and literature shown, displayed and/or demonstrated at tradeshows or conferences in the United States, including without limitation, CES. N/A N/A 16. All indemnity agreements in which N/A Elan has an indemnity obligation to another party related to patent infringement in the United States, including without limitation, for the Apple patents-in-suit. 17. Elan’s use or reference to Apple, N/A Apple products or Apple patents in the sales and marketing of Elan products. N/A 18. Communications or contacts with existing or potential customers regarding Apple products or Apple patents. Elan designee: TBD Yes, relates to Apple claims. Elan designee: Mr. Wayne Chang N/A N/A N/A -9LEGAL02/32717927v1 Yes, relates to Apple’s claim; the subject matter of the deposition will be short and the responsive and non-privileged information has been provided via interrogatory responses. Yes, relates to Apple claims. Elan designee: Mr. Wayne Chang Yes, relates to Apple claims. Appendix A ISO Elan Opposition To Apple Motion To Compel Elan Depositions in NDCA Comparison between Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics and NDCA Case Topics Similar or Redundant Apple ITC 30(b)(6) Topics Apple NDCA 30(b)(6) Topics At Issue Elan Witnesses Already Testified in California 19. The emulation, use, study, reverseengineering, or other consideration of any Apple product in the design and development of Elan products. Apple 2nd 30(b)(6) Depo Notice Topic 11 20. Authentication of documents and things regarding the foregoing topics. N/A N/A 21. The identity of persons knowledgeable N/A regarding the foregoing topics. N/A 11. All inspections, analyses, comparisons, examinations, reverse engineering, tests, or evaluations of Apple products, or any components contained therein, conducted by or for Elan - 10 LEGAL02/32717927v1 Mr. Wayne Chang, Nov 15 and 16, 2010 Whether Elan Will Produce Witness For This Topic Elan designee: Mr. Ian Chung (possibly one additional witness) Yes, relates to Apple claims. Elan designee: Mr. Eric Yang Yes; Relate to both parties’ claims; nonsubstantive topics Yes; Relate to both parties’ claims; nonsubstantive topics

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?