Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
384
Declaration of Nathan Greenblatt in Support of Apple's Opposition to Elan Microelectronic Corporation's Motion to Compel Discovery on Various Issues 357 filed byApple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 8/9/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-6000
Facsimile: (650) 802-6001
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
jared.bobrow@weil.com
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
sonal.mehta@weil.com
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
nathan.greenblatt@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
Apple Inc.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
19
20
21
22
23
v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.
24
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
DECLARATION OF NATHAN
GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT OF
APPLE’S OPPOSITION TO ELAN
MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION’S MOTION TO
COMPEL DISCOVERY ON VARIOUS
ISSUES
DATE:
TIME:
JUDGE:
CTRM:
August 30, 2011
10:00 a.m.
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
5
25
26
27
28
GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY ON VARIOUS ISSUES
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
I, Nathan Greenblatt, declare:
I am an attorney with the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel of
record for Defendant and Counterclaimant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the above-captioned matter. I
submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation. If
called upon as a witness, I could competently testify to the truth of each statement herein.
1.
Attached as Exhibit 1 is a true and correct copy of an email chain between
Derek Walter (counsel for Apple) and Jane Bu (counsel for Elan) with the most recent email
dated Monday, July 25, 2011 7:58 AM.
2.
Attached as Exhibit 2 is a true and correct copy of excerpts from the
deposition transcript of Greg Marriott (former Apple engineer) dated July 26, 2011.
3.
Attached as Exhibit 3 is a true and correct copy of part of the webpage
http://www.apple.com/ipodclassic/features.html (last visited Aug. 9, 2011).
4.
Attached as Exhibit 4 is a true and correct copy of part of the webpage
http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/ (last visited Aug. 9, 2011).
5.
Attached as Exhibit 5 is a true and correct copy of part of the webpage
http://www.apple.com/ipodtouch/features/ (last visited Aug. 9, 2011).
6.
Attached as Exhibit 6 is a true and correct copy of part of the webpage
http://www.apple.com/ipod/ (last visited Aug. 9, 2011).
7.
Attached as Exhibit 7 is a true and correct copy of part of the webpage
http://www.apple.com/ipodshuffle/ (last visited Aug. 9, 2011).
8.
Attached as Exhibit 8 is a true and correct copy of portions of the
deposition transcript (rough draft) of Stephanie Cinereski (former Apple engineer) dated Aug. 7,
2011 (filed under seal).
9.
Attached as Exhibit 9 is a true and correct copy of an email chain between
Derek Walter (counsel for Apple) and Palani Rathinasamy (counsel for Elan) with the most recent
email dated Tuesday, July 26, 2011 8:03 PM (filed under seal, partially redacted copy lodged
with the Court).
28
GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY ON VARIOUS ISSUES
2
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
2
3
4
5
10.
Attached as Exhibit 10 is a true and correct copy of a document bearing
production numbers APEL0404758 – 59 that has been produced in this case (filed under seal).
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on August 9, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
6
7
8
/s/ Nathan Greenblatt
Nathan Greenblatt
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
GREENBLATT DECL. ISO APPLE’S
OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO COMPEL
DISCOVERY ON VARIOUS ISSUES
3
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?