Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Filing
426
Administrative Motion to File Under Seal APPLE INC.'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT OF ELAN'S '352 PATENT BY APPLE'S CURRENT PRODUCTS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS filed by Apple, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Greenblatt, Nathan) (Filed on 9/14/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
MATTHEW D. POWERS (Bar No. 104795)
matthew.powers@tensegritylawgroup.com
TENSEGRITY LAW GROUP LLP
201 Redwood Shores Parkway, Suite 401
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-6000
Facsimile: (650) 802-6001
JARED BOBROW (Bar No. 133712)
jared.bobrow@weil.com
SONAL N. MEHTA (Bar No. 222086)
sonal.mehta@weil.com
DEREK C. WALTER (Bar. No. 246322)
derek.walter@weil.com
NATHAN GREENBLATT (Bar No. 262279)
nathan.greenblatt@weil.com
WEIL, GOTSHAL & MANGES LLP
Silicon Valley Office
201 Redwood Shores Parkway
Redwood Shores, CA 94065
Telephone: (650) 802-3000
Facsimile: (650) 802-3100
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaim Plaintiff
Apple Inc.
14
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
15
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
16
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
17
18
ELAN MICROELECTRONICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff and Counterclaim
Defendant,
19
20
21
22
23
v.
APPLE INC.,
Defendant and Counterclaim
Plaintiff.
24
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
DECLARATION OF NATHAN
GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT OF
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
FILE UNDER SEAL APPLE INC.’S
MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY
JUDGMENT OF NONINFRINGEMENT OF ELAN’S ‛352
PATENT BY APPLE’S CURRENT
PRODUCTS
JUDGE: Hon. Richard Seeborg
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
I, Nathan Greenblatt, declare:
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
I am an attorney with the law firm of Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP, counsel of
record for Defendant and Counter-Claimant Apple Inc. (“Apple”) in the above-captioned matter.
I submit this declaration based on personal knowledge and following a reasonable investigation.
If called upon as a witness, I could competently testify to the truth of each statement herein.
1.
I prepared the redacted version of Apple Inc.’s Motion for Partial Summary
Judgment of Non-Infringement of Elan’s ‛352 Patent by Apple’s Current Products (“Apple’s
Motion”). Based on my review, the redacted portions contain confidential technical information
regarding the operation of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm
Apple if publicly disclosed.
2.
I have reviewed Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of Derek Walter in Support of
Apple’s Motion (“Walter Declaration”). Based on my review, the exhibit consists predominantly
of confidential technical information regarding the operation of Apple’s products, as well as
internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
3.
I have reviewed Exhibit 4 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
4.
I have reviewed Exhibit 5 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
5.
I have reviewed Exhibit 6 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
6.
I have reviewed Exhibit 7 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists of a diagram portions of which reveal confidential technical information
regarding the operation of Apple’s products, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
7.
I have reviewed Exhibit 8 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
28
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
1
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
exhibit consists of a computer animation that reveals confidential technical information regarding
the operation of Apple’s products, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
8.
I have reviewed Exhibit 9 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists of a computer animation that reveals confidential technical information regarding
the operation of Apple’s products, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
9.
I have reviewed Exhibit 10 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
10.
I have reviewed Exhibit 11 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
11.
I have reviewed Exhibit 12 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
12.
I have reviewed Exhibit 13 to the Walter Declaration. Based on my review, the
exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation of
Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
13.
I prepared the redacted version of the Declaration of Ravin Balakrishnan in
Support of Apple’s Motion. Based on my review, the redacted portions contain confidential
technical information regarding the operation of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames,
which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
14.
I have reviewed Exhibit 1 to the Balakrishnan Declaration. Based on my review,
the exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation
of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly
disclosed.
15.
I have reviewed Exhibit 10 to the Balakrishnan Declaration. Based on my review,
the exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation
28
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
2
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly
disclosed.
16.
I have reviewed Exhibit 11 to the Balakrishnan Declaration. Based on my review,
the exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation
of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly
disclosed.
17.
I have reviewed Exhibit 12 to the Balakrishnan Declaration. Based on my review,
the exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation
of Apple’s products which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
18.
I have reviewed Exhibit 13 to the Balakrishnan Declaration. Based on my review,
the exhibit consists predominantly of confidential technical information regarding the operation
of Apple’s products, as well as internal codenames, which could harm Apple if publicly
disclosed.
19.
I have reviewed Exhibit 14 to the Balakrishnan Declaration. Based on my review,
the exhibit consists of a computer animation that reveals confidential technical information
regarding the operation of Apple’s products, which could harm Apple if publicly disclosed.
17
18
19
20
I declare under the penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of
America that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed on September 13, 2011, at Redwood Shores, California.
21
22
/s/ Nathan Greenblatt
Nathan Greenblatt
23
24
25
26
27
28
DECLARATION OF NATHAN GREENBLATT IN SUPPORT
OF ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL
3
Case No. C-09-01531 RS (PSG)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?