Elan Microelectronics Corporation v. Apple, Inc.
Declaration of Sean P. DeBruine in Support of Motion to Stay Pending Final Determination by the ITC of Investigation No 337-TA-714 re 78 filed byElan Microelectronics Corporation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E) (DeBruine, Sean) (Filed on 4/27/2010) Modified on 4/28/2010 (bw, COURT STAFF).
Page 1 of 2
From: Sent: To: Cc: Mehta, Sonal [Sonal.Mehta@weil.com] Tuesday, April 27, 2010 5:46 PM DeBruine, Sean Apple Elan WGM Service; Elan Apple Team
Subject: RE: Elan-Apple: ITC Investigation
Sean, Apple does not plan to seek a stay of the district court action based on the ITC investigation. With respect to Elan's motion to stay, we will take a position once we have seen the motion. On your request for an expedited briefing schedule, your email at 4:30 pm today does not give us sufficient time to consider the request, especially in the abstract. Again, we will take a position on the expedited briefing schedule once we have seen the motion. As to your suggestion that the parties discuss whether we can reach agreement on the outstanding claim construction issues, we are of course open to such a discussion. We are available on Friday afternoon at 1:30 pm. Please let us know if you are available at that time. Regards, Sonal N. Mehta Weil Gotshal & Manges 201 Redwood Shores Pkwy Redwood Shores, CA 94065 t: (650) 802-3118 f: (650) 802-3100 email@example.com
From: Sean.DeBruine@alston.com [mailto:Sean.DeBruine@alston.com] Sent: Tuesday, April 27, 2010 4:29 PM To: Mehta, Sonal Cc: Apple Elan WGM Service; Elan.Apple.Team@alston.com Subject: FW: Elan-Apple: ITC Investigation Sonal, I wanted to make sure you saw the email below. It was sent by my assistant on my behalf because I was out of the office yesterday. Please let me know if Apple has a position with regard to the motion to stay. Also, Elan intends to ask the Court to shorten the time for Apple's response to the motion and any hearing the Court may wish. In particular Elan intends to ask that Apple's response to the motion to stay be made due on Monday, May 3, such that the motion may be decided before the upcoming Markman deadlines. Please let me know if Apple agrees to or opposes that schedule. Thanks. Sean
________ ________ _______ ________ ________ _______ Morris, John Monday, April 26, 2010 11:54 AM Sonal.Mehta@weil.com; DeBruine, Sean Apple.Elan.WGM.Service@weil.com; Elan Apple Team
Page 2 of 2
Apple: ITC Investigation
Dear Sonal, As you may have heard, today the ITC inst ituted the investigation based on Elan's complaint. In our last communication you said that Apple would most likely not see k a stay of the district court proceedings. Assuming that is still Apple's position Elan intends to bring a motion to stay as to its asserted patents tomorrow. Please let me know by close of business tomorrow whether Apple will agree to such a stay. Also, assuming that the case will proceed on Apple's asserted patents I think it would be productive to discuss whether we can reach agreement on any or all of the outstanding claim construction issues. Af ter reviewing the parties' positions and the expert depositions there are several terms where the parties appear to be in substantial agreement. I am certain Judge Seeborg would appreciate any attempts we can make to reduce the number of claim te rms in dispute. Please let me know if Apple is available to discuss this issue later this week. Best regards Sean
William (John) Morris
Legal Secretary to Sean P. DeBruine
ALSTON & BIRD LLP
Two Palo Alto Square 3000 El Camino Real, Suite 400 Palo Alto, CA 94306 650.838.2015 D 650.838.2001 F www.alston.com Atlanta Charlotte Dallas New York Research Triangle Washington DC Silicon Valley Los Angeles 11th consecutive year on FortuneŽ magazine's "The 100 Best Companies to Work For"TM
******************************************************* IRS Circular 230 disclosure: To ensure compliance with requirements imposed by the IRS and other taxing authorities, we inform you that any tax advice contained in this communication (including any attachments) is not intended or written to be used, and cannot be used, for the purpose of (i) avoiding penalties that may be imposed on any taxpayer or (ii) promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any transaction or matter addressed herein. ______________________________________________________ NOTICE: This email message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (404-881-7000) or by electronic mail (firstname.lastname@example.org), and delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.
The information contained in this email message is intended only for use of the individual or entity named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify us by email (email@example.com), and destroy the original message. Thank you.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?