Cabibi v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 9

ORDER Requesting U.S. Marshal to Serve Complaint on Defendant. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 12/10/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Mailing)(lhklc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/10/2010)

Download PDF
Cabibi v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SCOTT C. CABIBI, v. Plaintiff, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 09-CV-03768-LHK ORDER REQUESTING U.S. MARSHAL TO SERVE COMPLAINT COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. Plaintiff filed his first complaint, seeking review of a determination of the Social Security Administration (SSA), on August 17, 2009. Compl. (Dkt. No. 1). On August 21, 2009, Judge Ware (to whom this case was previously assigned) issued an order dismissing the complaint with leave to amend. Specifically, Judge Ware held that because Plaintiff did not allege the date of the SSA's decision, it was impossible to determine if the Plaintiff's complaint was timely. See August 21, 2009 Order (Dkt. No. 4); 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The Order also states that "[u]pon filing of the Amended Complaint, the Clerk shall issue the Summons. It is further ordered that the U.S. Marshal for the Northern District of California serve, without prepayment of fees, a copy of the Amended Complaint, scheduling orders, attachments, Plaintiff's affidavit and this order upon Defendant." In the same Order, Judge Ware granted Plaintiff leave to proceed in forma pauperis. On September 9, 2009, Plaintiff filed an amended complaint attaching a letter from the SSA dated July 28, 2009. The letter states that Plaintiff's request for an extension of time to seek judicial review to 35 days from July 28, 2009. Because Plaintiff's initial complaint was filed 1 Case No.: 10-CV-02337-LHK ORDER GRANTING/DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 August 17, 2009, it appears his complaint was timely. However, no Summons has been issued and it appears that Defendant has not been served with the required documents. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the Clerk shall issue the Summons. Pursuant to Plantiff's in forma pauperis request having been granted, the U.S. Marshal shall serve, with prepayment of fees a copy of the Amended Complaint (Dkt. No. 5), the Scheduling Order (Dkt. No. 3), the August 21, 2009 Order (Dkt. No. 4), additional information submitted by Plaintiff (Dkt. Nos. 6, 7), and this Order upon Defendants. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 10, 2010 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 2 Case No.: 10-CV-02337-LHK ORDER GRANTING/DENYING MOTION TO TRANSFER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?