Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc.

Filing 53

ORDER GRANTING MEDIAPOSTS MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION; GRANTING MEDIAPOST LIMITED INTERVENTION; DENYING MEDIAPOSTS MOTION TO UNSEALgranting in part and denying in part 49 Motion for Reconsideration re 49 MOTION for Reconsideration re 48 Order on Motion for Leave to File filed by MediaPost Communications (jwlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/27/2010)

Download PDF
Rocky Mountain Bank -v- Google, Inc. Doc. 53 Att. 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO Dale K. Galipo, State Bar No. 144074 21800 Burbank Boulevard, Suite 310 Woodland Hills, California 91367 (818) 347-3333 - Telephone (818) 347-4118 - Facsimile dalekgalipo@yahoo.com Attorneys for Marylon Boyd, Individually, and as Executor of the Estate of Cammerin K. Boyd UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CASE NO.: CV 04-5459-MMC MARYLON BOYD, individually and as Executor of the Estate of CAMMERIN BOYD, ISABEL GONZALEZ, a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Isela Gonzalez, and KANANI BOYD, a minor by and through her STIPULATION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO PLAINTIFFS' Guardian Ad Litem, Kamilah Boyd, COMPLAINT TO ADD AN EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BATTERY Plaintiffs, vs. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, HEATHER J. FONG, WILLIAM ELIEFF, GREGORY KANE, JAMES O'MALLEY, TIMOTHY PAINE, STEVEN STEARNS, and DOES 1 to 10, inclusive, Defendants. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the plaintiffs through their respective attorneys of record and defendants through their respective attorneys of record, that the plaintiffs be allowed to amend the complaint by adding an eighth cause of action for battery. A proposed first amended complaint with the proposed eighth cause of action for battery was sent to attorney Blake P. Loebs on October 27, 2006, and is attached hereto as Exhibit "1." /// 1 STIPULATION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT TO ADD AN EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BATTERY Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The parties request that the Court accept the plaintiffs' proposed first amended complaint for filing. The parties are further agreeable that the defendants' answer to the plaintiffs' original complaint can be deemed the answer to the plaintiffs' first amended complaint. I hereby attest that I have on file all holograph signatures for any signatures indicated by a "conformed" signature (/S/) within this efiled document. LAW OFFICES OF DALE K. GALIPO DATE: November 10, 2006 /S/ _ DALE K. GALIPO Attorneys for Plaintiff MARYLON BOYD, Individually, and as Executor of the Estate of CAMMERIN BOYD LAW OFFICES OF VICKI I. SARMIENTO DATE: November 12, 2006 /S/ _ VICKI I. SARMIENTO Attorneys for Plaintiffs ISABEL GONZALEZ, a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Isela Gonzalez, and KANANI BOYD, a minor by and through her Guardian Ad Litem, Kamilah Boyd DENNIS J. HERERA, City Attorney JOANNE HOEPER, Chief Trial Attorney BLAKE P. LOEBS, Deputy City Attorney DATE: November 9, 2006 /S/ _ BLAKE P. LOEBS Attorneys for Defendants City and County of San Francisco, et. al. 2 STIPULATION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT TO ADD AN EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BATTERY 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED: That plaintiffs be granted leave to amend the complaint by adding an eighth cause of action for battery, and allow the filing of the plaintiffs' first amended complaint with the Court. Further, that the defendants' answer to the original complaint will be deemed by the Court to be the answer to the plaintiffs' first amended complaint. DATED: __________________ __________________________________ HONORABLE MAXINE CHESNEY 3 STIPULATION TO ALLOW AMENDMENT TO PLAINTIFFS' COMPLAINT TO ADD AN EIGHTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR BATTERY

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?