craigslist, Inc. v. Troopal Strategies, Inc. et al
Filing
1
COMPLAINT /issued summons against Ryan Addams, Suzanne Demere-Murphy, Joshua McClure, TOM Games, Inc., Timothy Taylor, Troopal Strategies, Inc. ( Filing fee $ 350, receipt number 34611037441.). Filed bycraigslist, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ga, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2009)
1
Brian Hennessy (SBN 226721)
E-mail: BHennessv(a>,perkinscoie.com
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Perkins Coie LLP
101 Jefferson Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025-1114
Telephone: (650) 838-4300
Facsimile: (650) 838-4350
Elizabeth L. McDougall, WA Bar No. 27026 (pro hac to follow)
E-mail: EMcDougall@perkinscoie.com
Perkins Coie LLP
1201 Third Avenue, Suite 4800
Seattle, Washington 98101-3099
Telephone: (206) 359-8000
Facsimile: (206) 359-9000
Attorneys for Plaintiff
craigslist, Inc.
11
12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
14
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
15
16
craigslist, Inc., a Delaware corporation,
Plaintiff,
17
18
19
20
21
22
v.
Troopal Strategies, Inc., a Panama
corporation; TOM Games, Inc., a Texas
corporation; Joshua McClure, Suzanne
Demere-Murphy, Timothy Taylor, Ryan
Addams, individuals; and Does 1 through
25, inclusive,
Defendants.
23
24
PLAINTIFF CRAIGSLIST, INC.'S
COMPLAINT FOR:
(1) COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT,
17 U.S.C. § 101, et seq.; (2) VIOLATION OF
THE DIGITAL MILLENNIUM
COPYRIGHT ACT, 17 U.S.C. § 1201;
(3) VIOLATION OF THE COMPUTER
FRAUD AND ABUSE ACT, 18 U.S.C.
§1030; (4) VIOLATION OF CALIFORNIA
PENAL CODE § 502; (5) TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1114, AND
1125(A); (6) TRADEMARK
INFRINGEMENT UNDER CALIFORNIA
LAW; (7) BREACH OF CONTRACT;
(8) INDUCING BREACH OF CONTRACT;
(9) INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE
WITH CONTRACTUAL RELATIONS;
AND (10) FRAUD;
25
26
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL.
27
28
-1COMPLAINT
40753-0043.0021/Legal 16001808.5
1
2
I.
1.
INTRODUCTION
craigslist operates the website, www.craigslist.org. which provides online
3
localized classified ad placements and related online services in 700 cities in 70 countries
4
worldwide, craigslist is one of the most visited websites in the world with more than 50 million
5
Americans alone visiting the craigslist website each month generating more than 20 billion page
6
views, and posting more than 40 million free classified ads. The smooth operation and functional
7
usability of the website is vital to craigslist and to the millions of people who rely on its services
8
each and every day. Unfortunately, craigslist is required to expend significant resources in
9
combating abuse by individuals who wish to profit by flooding craigslist with illegitimate
10
advertisements and by otherwise conducting prohibited activities at the expense of craigslist and
11
legitimate craigslist users.
12
2.
Defendants are engaged in intentional for-profit abuse of craigslist that threatens
13
the very operation of the services and communities that craigslist has built. Defendants develop,
14
offer, market and distribute illegal tools and services designed to greatly facilitate and amplify
15
unauthorized and illegal uses of craigslist's classified services - at the expense of craigslist and
16
legitimate craigslist users.
17
3.
Defendant's ongoing activities burden craigslist's systems and services and damage
18
craigslist's free local online marketplace communities as well as craigslist's reputation and
19
goodwill.
20
4.
craigslist brings this action to protect its services and the communities that rely on
21
its services from being injured by self-interested profiteers undermining and debasing craigslist's
22
services in the pursuit of ill-gotten gains.
23
24
25
II.
5.
JURISDICTION
The Court has jurisdiction over this action pursuant to:
a.
28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 andl338, because this action alleges violations of
26
federal statutes, including 17 U.S.C. § 101, etseq., 17 U.S.C. § 1201, 18 U.S.C. § 1030, 15
27
U.S.C. §§1114andll25(a);
28
-2COMPLAINT
40753-0043.002 I/Legal 16001808.5
1
b.
additionally or alternatively, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, because there may be
2
complete diversity of citizenship between the parties which will be determined when all
3
defendants are identified, and because the matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of
4
$75,000, exclusive of interest and costs; and
5
c.
28 U.S.C. § 1367 (supplemental jurisdiction), because the claims alleged
6
under state law are so related to claims in this action over which this Court has original
7
jurisdiction that they form part of the same case and controversy under Article III of the United
8
States Constitution.
9
10
III.
6.
VENUE
Venue is proper in this District under 28 U.S.C. § 1391, because a substantial part
11
of the events or omissions giving rise to the claims occurred in this District: Defendants accessed
12
and used craigslist's computers and services to transact their affairs, craigslist is located in this
13
District, and a substantial part of craigslist's property, which was targeted and damaged by
14
Defendants' acts, is situated in this District.
15
7.
In addition, craigslist's Terms of Use ("TOU") govern Defendants' access to and
16
use of the craigslist website and craigslist's services. The TOU provide that courts located within
17
the county of San Francisco, California, shall have exclusive jurisdiction over the relationship
18
between craigslist and Defendants.
19
8.
Intradistrict Assignment is proper in the San Francisco Division of this Court
20
pursuant to Civil Local Rules 3-5(b) and 3-2(c) for the reasons stated above.
21
IV.
22
23
24
25
26
27
9.
THE PARTIES
craigslist, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, with its principal place of business in
San Francisco, California.
10.
craigslist is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Defendant
Troopal Strategies, Inc. is a Panama corporation.
11.
craigslist is informed and believes, and on that basis alleges, that Defendant TOM
Games, Inc. is a Texas corporation with its principal place of business in Austin, Texas.
28
-340753-0043.002 I/Legal 16001808.5
COMPLAINT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?