Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 103

MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' Extrinsic Speaking Evidence Submitted in Support of Their Opposition to Motion to Dismiss filed by Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 [e-mail] Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 3 [e-mail] 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFFS' EXTRINSIC SPEAKING EVIDENCE

12 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 13 INC., a Delaware corporation, 14 15 vs. Plaintiffs,

16 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3480759.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RS

1

Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. ("Fusion Garage") has filed a Motion to Strike

2 Extrinsic Speaking Evidence that plaintiffs submitted in support of their Opposition to Fusion 3 Garage's Motion to Dismiss. After reviewing the parties' submissions, Fusion Garage's motion is 4 GRANTED. The extrinsic evidence (Scherb Decl. and Exhibits A-J thereto) is stricken. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
04049.51632/3480759.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

SO ORDERED this ______ day of _______________, 2010.

___________________________________ THE HON. RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE EXTRINSIC EVIDENCE CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RS

1