Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 105

Declaration of Patrick C. Doolittle in Support of 104 MOTION to Seal Document 102 Reply Memorandum filed byFusion Garage PTE. LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) 104 ) (Doolittle, Patrick) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART & SULLIVAN, LLP Claude M. Stern (Bar No. 96737) 2 claudestern@quinnemanuel.com Patrick Doolittle (Bar No. 203659) 3 patrickdoolittle@quinnemanuel.com 50 California Street, 22nd Floor 4 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 5 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 6 Attorneys for Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd 7 8 9 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION CASE NO. 09-cv-5812 RS [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING FUSION GARAGE'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL 12 INTERSERVE, INC. dba TECHCRUNCH, a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, 13 INC., a Delaware corporation, 14 15 vs. Plaintiffs, 16 FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD, a Singapore company, 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632/3480482.1 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RS 1 Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. ("Fusion Garage") has filed an Administrative Motion 2 to file under seal the Reply Brief to its Motion to Dismiss, to Strike, and for a More Definite 3 Statement. After reviewing the parties' submissions, Fusion Garage's motion is GRANTED. The 4 Reply Brief shall be filed under seal. Fusion Garage shall file a redacted version of the brief in the 5 public record. 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 04049.51632/3480482.1 IT IS SO ORDERED. SO ORDERED this ______ day of _______________, 2010. ___________________________________ THE HON. RICHARD SEEBORG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO FILE UNDER SEAL CASE NO. 09-CV-5812 RS 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?