Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 110

MOTION to Seal Document 109 Reply Memorandum, filed by CrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Scherb Declaration, # 2 Bloch Declaration, # 3 Proposed Order)(Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 5/3/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) ABridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) DBloch@winston.com Matthew A. Scherb (SBN: 237461) MScherb@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH and CRUNCHPAD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH, ) a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Case No. CV-09-5812 RS (PVT) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL (REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION) 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Winston & Strawn LLP -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL - Case No. 09-CV-5812 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 For good cause shown, the Court grants Plaintiffs' administrative motion to file under seal portions of its papers in opposition to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiffs' redacted pleading shall remain in the public record, but the Clerk shall file the lodged, un-redacted version and lodged declaration exhibits under seal. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _________________ ______________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE SF:281113.1 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO SEAL - Case No. 09-CV-5812 Winston & Strawn LLP

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?