Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 117

MOTION for Leave to File Supplemental Declarations in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction filed by CrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration ISO Motion for Leave, # 2 Proposed Order, # 3 Supp. Bridges Decl. in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction Motion, # 4 Supp. Bridges Decl. in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction Motion (REDACTED VERSION), # 5 Supp. Teare Decl. in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Preliminary Injunction Motion)(Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 5/11/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) Abridges@winston.com David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) DBloch@winston.com Matthew A. Scherb (SBN: 237461) MScherb@winston.com WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: (415) 591-1000 Facsimile: (415) 591-1400 Attorneys for Plaintiffs INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH and CRUNCHPAD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Winston & Strawn LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SF:281718.1 INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH, ) a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Case No. CV-09-5812 RS (PVT) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL DECLARATIONS IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Case No. 09-CV-5812 RS (PVT) 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5894 For good cause shown, the Court grants Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file. documents: These (1) Supplemental Declaration of Andrew P. Bridges in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction; and (2) Supplemental Declaration of Keith Teare in Further Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Preliminary Injunction, which Plaintiffs lodged with their motion for leave, are deemed filed and part of the record related to Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _________________ ______________________________ Hon. Richard Seeborg UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Winston & Strawn LLP 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SF:281718.1 Case No. 09-CV-5812 RS (PVT)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?