Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 180

EXHIBITS re 179 Memorandum in Opposition, Exhibit G filed byFusion Garage PTE. LTD. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit H, # 2 Exhibit I, # 3 Exhibit J, # 4 Exhibit K, # 5 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) 179 ) (Pennypacker, Evette) (Filed on 9/23/2010)

Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Doc. 180 Att. 5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 TECHCRUNCH, INC., a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, INC., a 12 Delaware corporation, 13 14 vs. Plaintiffs, CASE NO. C 09-cv-5812 RS (PVT) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO COMPEL PRODUCTION OF WITHHELD INFORMATION AND DOCUMENTS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

15 FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD., a Singapore company, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Having considered Plaintiff TechCrunch, Inc. and Plaintiff CrunchPad, Inc.'s

19 ("Plaintiffs'") Motion to Compel Production of Withheld Information and Documents ("Motion") 20 (Dkt. 164), Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd.'s Opposition, the evidence submitted in support of 21 each, and the arguments of counsel, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion is 22 DENIED. 23 It is SO ORDERED.

24 DATED: _________________, 2010 25 26 27 28 HON. PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com