Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 234

Statement of Non-Opposition re 230 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney Quinn Emanuel's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Fusion Garage PTE. LTD. and Request For Further Relief filed byCrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Related document(s) 230 ) (Bloch, David) (Filed on 12/27/2011)

1

5

David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530)
[e-mail]
J. Caleb Donaldson (SBN: 257271)
[e-mail]
WINSTON & STRAWN LLP
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802
Telephone: (415)
591-1000
Facsimile: (415)
591-1400

6

Attorneys for Plaintiffs

2
3
4

7
8

Winston & Strawn LLP

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10
101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

9

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

12
13
14
15
16

TECHCRUNCH, INC., et al.
Plaintiffs,
vs.
FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD.,
Defendant.

17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No. 3:09-cv-05812 RS (PSG)
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING QUINN
EMANUEL’S MOTION TO WITHDRAW

18
19

The motion of Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP to withdraw as counsel of record

20

for Fusion Garage PTE. Ltd. came on regularly for hearing on January 19, 2012, at 1:30 p.m. in

21

Courtroom 3 of the above-entitled Court, the Honorable Richard Seeborg presiding. All parties were

22

given notice of the hearing. Plaintiffs TechCrunch Inc. and CrunchPad Inc. did not oppose the

23

motion.

24

Having considered all papers filed herein and the oral argument of counsel, and good cause

25

appearing: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Quinn Emanuel’s Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for

26

Fusion Garage is hereby GRANTED.

27

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT:

28

1. Defendant shall retain new counsel within 21 days from the date of this order. On
-1-

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Case No. 3:09-cv-05812 RS (PSG)

1

February 9, 2012, if Defendant has not by then secured new counsel, Defendant is

2

ordered to show cause why default should not issue in favor of TechCrunch and

3

CrunchPad.

4

2. If Fusion Garage has retained counsel pursuant to Paragraph 1, above, this case shall be

5

REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Laporte, sitting as the judge charged with overseeing

6

the Northern District of California’s ADR program, to address issues arising out of the

7

prior mediation between the parties; and the parties shall be ORDERED to further

8

mediation under the auspices of this Court and in full compliance with the ADR Local

9

Rules.

Winston & Strawn LLP

101 California Street
San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

10

3. The parties shall exchange those discovery responses previously due on December 16,

11

2011, within 14 days of the date of this Order.

12

IT IS SO ORDERED.

13

DATED: January ___, 2012

14

HON. RICHARD SEEBORG
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
SF:325579.1

-2-

Case No. 3:09-cv-05812 RS (PSG)