Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 27

MOTION to Shorten Time re 26 MOTION for Preliminary Injunction filed by CrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Bloch Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 2/22/2010) Modified on 2/23/2010,(counsel failed to properly link to motion.) (cv, COURT STAFF).

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) [e-mail] David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) [e-mail] Matthew A. Scherb (SBN: 237461) [e-mail] WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH and CRUNCHPAD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH, ) a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE. LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Case No. CV-09-5812 JW (PVT) [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION TO CHANGE TIME OF HEARING

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Winston & Strawn LLP

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT TO CHANGE TIME OF HEARING Case No. 09-CV-5812

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Upon consideration of TechCrunch's administrative motion to change the time of the hearing on their motion preliminary injunction, the Court GRANTS the motion as follows: The Court sets the hearing on the motion for _____, 2010. - or, alternatively The Court refers TechCrunch's preliminary injunction motion to Magistrate Judge Trumbull, who shall issue a report and recommendation. The Magistrate Judge shall conduct a hearing as promptly as possible on or after March 29, 2010, and shall give the parties notice of the actual hearing date and time by the Court's ECF system. Dated: __________ _________________________________ HON. JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Winston & Strawn LLP

-2[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOT TO CHANGE TIME OF HEARING Case No. 09-CV-5812