Interserve, Inc. et al v. Fusion Garage PTE. LTD

Filing 29

Memorandum in Opposition re 23 MOTION for Protective Order Pending Plaintiff's Identification of its Allegedly Misappropriated Trade Secrets; Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed byCrunchPad, Inc., Interserve, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Bloch Declaration, # 2 Proposed Order)(Scherb, Matthew) (Filed on 2/23/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
101 California Street San Francisco, CA 94111-5802

Andrew P. Bridges (SBN: 122761) [e-mail] David S. Bloch (SBN: 184530) [e-mail] Matthew A. Scherb (SBN: 237461) [e-mail] WINSTON & STRAWN LLP 101 California Street, 39th Floor San Francisco, CA 94111-5802 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiffs INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH and CRUNCHPAD, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION INTERSERVE, INC., dba TECHCRUNCH, ) a Delaware corporation, and CRUNCHPAD, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) FUSION GARAGE PTE LTD., a Singapore ) company, ) ) Defendant. ) ) ) Case No. CV-09-5812 JW (PVT)

11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Winston & Strawn LLP

[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT FUSION GARAGE'S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER

Defendant Fusion Garage PTE Ltd. Moves for a protective order. The court has reviewed the papers and considered the arguments of counsel. The Court DENIES the motion. Defendant shall furnish complete discovery responses within five days of this Order or be precluded from relying upon any matters that are the subject of the pending discovery in its opposition to the pending motion for preliminary injunction. Dated: __________ _________________________________ HON. PATRICIA V. TRUMBULL UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

-1[PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR PROT. ORDER

Case No. 09-CV-5812 JW (PVT)