Washington v. Sandoval et al
Filing
63
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 60 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
13
14
15
16
JESSE WASHINGTON,
C 10-0250 LHK (PR)
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE A
REPLY REGARDING THEIR MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
v.
D. SANDOVAL, et al.,
17
Defendants.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Defendants Sandoval, Sandquist, and Townsend move this Court for an extension of time to
file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, up to and
including January 11, 2012. After full consideration, and good cause appearing, Defendants’
motion for extension of time is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/3/12
Dated:___________________
_____________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Ext. Reply Deadline
Washington v. Sandoval, et. al. (C 10-0250 LHK (PR))
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?