Washington v. Sandoval et al

Filing 63

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 60 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/4/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16

JESSE WASHINGTON,

C 10-0250 LHK (PR)
Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER EXTENDING
DEFENDANTS’ DEADLINE TO FILE A
REPLY REGARDING THEIR MOTION
FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

v.
D. SANDOVAL, et al.,

17

Defendants.

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Defendants Sandoval, Sandquist, and Townsend move this Court for an extension of time to
file a reply to plaintiff’s opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, up to and
including January 11, 2012. After full consideration, and good cause appearing, Defendants’
motion for extension of time is granted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
1/3/12
Dated:___________________

_____________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

26
27
28
1
[Proposed] Order Ext. Reply Deadline

Washington v. Sandoval, et. al. (C 10-0250 LHK (PR))