Treglia v. Kate et al

Filing 109

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 105 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/14/2011)

Download PDF
- - --------- -- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DANIEL TREGLIA, Case No. C 10-0757 LHK (PR) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 15 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO CHANGE TIME TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MATTHEW CATE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendants Chisman, Kernan, Cate, Jacquez, Daharsh, Clancy, O'Donnell, Darby, McLean, 19 . Kelley, Howell, and Cabrera have moved for a fifteen-day extension, up to and including October 20 26, 2011, in which to file a reply in support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. The 21 Court has read and considered Defendants' motion to change time and the accompanying 22 declaration of counsel and, good cause appearing, 23 II 24 II 25 II 26 27 28 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.' Mot. Change Time File Reply (C 10-0757 LHK (PR)) 1 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' requested extension oftime is GRANTED. The time in 2 which Defendants may file a reply in support of the summary judgment motion is extended up to 3 and including October 26, 2011. 4 5 10/14/11 Dated: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH United States District Court 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 [Proposed] Order Granting Defs.' Mot. Change Time File Reply (C I 0-0757 LHK (PR))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?