Treglia v. Kate et al

Filing 73

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 67 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 DANIEL TREGLIA, v. Case No. C 10-0757 LHK (PR) Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER CHANGING TIME TO FILE DISPOSITIVE MOTION MATTHEW CATE, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Defendants have moved this Court for an extension of time to file a summary-judgment or 19 other dispositive motion, up to and including July 29, 2011. After full consideration, and good 20 cause appearing, Defendants’ motion for extension of time is GRANTED. 21 Plaintiff shall file his opposition within thirty days of Defendants’ filing of their dispositive 22 motion. If Defendants wish to file a reply, they shall do so within fifteen days of the filing of the 23 opposition. Absent further order, the motion will be submitted on the date the reply is filed, 24 without a hearing. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 Dated: __6/7/11 __________________________ The Honorable Lucy H. Koh 28 1 [Proposed] Order Changing Time to File Dispositive Motion (C 10-0757 LHK (PR))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?