Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. Williams et al
Filing
18
Second MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Zynga Game Network, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Continuing Case Management Conference)(Caplan, David) (Filed on 8/6/2010)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668)
E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com
Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407)
E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com
David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174)
E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com
Tara D. Rose (Bar No. 256079)
E-Mail: trose@kmwlaw.com
KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP
9720 Wilshire Boulevard
Penthouse Suite
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: (310) 248-3830
Facsimile: (310) 860-0363
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
JASON WILLIAMS, an individual, LUNA
MARTINI, an individual, and JOHN DOES 1-5
D/B/A MW GROUP
Defendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
1
The COURT, having considered Plaintiff Zynga Game Network Inc.’s (“Zynga’s”) Motion
2
to Continue Case Management Conference (“Motion”) and the pleadings on file in this matter,
3
hereby GRANTS Zynga’s Motion.
4
The Case Management Conference is hereby continued until Friday, November 5, 2010 at
5
10:30 A.M. All other dates and deadlines related to the Case Management Conference are hereby
6
continued accordingly.
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
9
10
ENTERED THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2010.
11
12
13
_____________________________________
The Honorable Jeremy Fogel,
United States District Court Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
[PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?