Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. Williams et al

Filing 32

Fourth MOTION to Continue Case Management Conference; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Zynga Game Network, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Caplan, David) (Filed on 1/5/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668) E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407) E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174) E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com Tara D. Rose (Bar No. 256079) E-Mail: trose@kmwlaw.com KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP 9720 Wilshire Boulevard Penthouse Suite Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone: (310) 248-3830 Facsimile: (310) 860-0363 8 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC. 10 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC., a Delaware Corporation, 17 18 19 20 21 22 Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE v. JASON WILLIAMS, an individual, LUNA MARTINI, an individual, WAN-WEN KUO, an individual, and JOHN DOES 4-5 D/B/A MW GROUP Defendants. 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 The COURT, having considered Plaintiff Zynga Game Network Inc.’s (“Zynga’s”) Fourth 2 Motion to Continue the Case Management Conference (“Motion”) and the pleadings on file in this 3 matter, hereby GRANTS Zynga’s Motion. 4 The Case Management Conference is hereby continued until Friday, April 15, 2011 at 10:30 5 A.M. All other dates and deadlines related to the Case Management Conference are hereby 6 continued accordingly. 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 ENTERED THIS ____ DAY OF __________, 2011. 11 12 13 _____________________________________ The Honorable Jeremy Fogel, United States District Court Judge 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -1- 28 CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PSGx) [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?