Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. Williams et al
Filing
9
MOTION for Discovery Motion for Leave to Conduct Third Party Discovery; and Memorandum of Points and Authorities filed by Zynga Game Network, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Granting Leave To Conduct Third Party Discovery)(Caplan, David) (Filed on 5/12/2010)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668)
E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com
Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407)
E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com
David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174)
E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com
Tara D. Rose (Bar No. 256079)
E-Mail: trose@kmwlaw.com
KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP
9720 Wilshire Boulevard
Penthouse Suite
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: (310) 248-3830
Facsimile: (310) 860-0363
8
9
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC.
10
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC., a Delaware
Corporation,
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
16
17
18
19
20
21
Plaintiff,
v.
JASON WILLIAMS, an individual, LUNA
MARTINI, an individual, and JOHN DOES 1-5
D/B/A MW GROUP
Defendants.
PLAINTIFF ZYNGA GAME NETWORK
INC.’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY;
AND
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND
AUTHORITIES
NO HEARING DATE REQUESTED
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC.’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AN AUTHORITIES
1
MOTION
2
Plaintiff Zynga Game Network Inc. (“Zynga”) hereby moves the Court for an order
3
authorizing it to conduct third party discovery to discover the true identities and locations of
4
defendants Jason Williams, Luna Martini and John Does 1-5, d/b/a “MW Group” (collectively
5
“Defendants”). This motion is based on the Motion, the supporting Memorandum of Points and
6
Authorities, the Declarations of Sean Hanley and Tara D. Rose, the [Proposed] Order, all pleadings
7
on file in this action, and any other matter that may be submitted in support of the motion.
8
ISSUE TO BE DECIDED
9
10
Whether Zynga shall be granted leave to conduct third party discovery to determine the true
identities and locations of Defendants.
11
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
12
I.
13
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Zynga Game Network Inc. (“Zynga”) respectfully requests leave to conduct the
14
discovery necessary to confirm the true identities and locations of the Defendants in this action (the
15
“Action”). Defendants have established one or more unauthorized and illegal websites through
16
which they unlawfully sell various virtual in-game digital items for use in Zynga’s online game
17
Mafia Wars. To stop Defendants’ illegal activities, Zynga filed the Action and is seeking damages
18
and injunctive relief under the Lanham Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, the California
19
Unfair Business Practices statute, California Penal Code § 502 and California common law.
20
Defendants have taken steps to conceal their true identities and locations from Zynga.
21
However, operation of Defendants’ websites through which they conduct their infringing conduct
22
requires the services of legitimate, independent companies to which Defendants must provide some
23
accurate information regarding their identities and locations, including contact and billing
24
information. Zynga seeks leave to conduct discovery of these non-party entities in order to identify,
25
locate and serve Defendants with process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4.
26
//
27
//
28
-1-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
2
3
II.
A.
FACTS
Defendants’ Unlawful and Infringing Conduct
Zynga is the largest social gaming company, providing, inter alia, online poker games, word
4
games, board games, role playing games and party games including Zynga Poker, Mafia Wars,
5
YoVille, Vampires, Street Racing, Scramble and Word Twist. (Declaration of Sean Hanley
6
(“Hanley Decl.”) ¶ 2.) Zynga’s games are available on Facebook, MySpace, Bebo, Hi5, Friendster,
7
Tagged, Yahoo!, the iPhone and iPod Touch, among others. (Id.)
8
Zynga’s games have been a runaway success. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 3.) One of Zynga’s most
9
popular properties is Mafia Wars (the “Game”), a computer game for use on wireless devices and
10
computers that allows users to start a Mafia family with their friends and compete to become the
11
most powerful family. (Id. ¶ 4.) Zynga has made use of the service mark MAFIA WARS in
12
commerce since September 2008. (Id. ¶ 5.) Zynga has made use of the trademark MAFIA WARS
13
in commerce since April 2009. (Id.) (The MAFIA WARS trademark and service mark are referred
14
herein collectively as the “Mark”.) Zynga currently owns United States Federal Trademark
15
Application Serial No. 77772110 for the Mark MAFIA WARS in International Class 009 for
16
downloadable computer game software for use on wireless devices and computers, and International
17
Class 041 for entertainment services, namely, providing on-line computer games. (Id. ¶ 6.)
18
Zynga’s success and the success of its MAFIA WARS Mark have been widely reported in
19
the press, on the Internet and in blogs. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 7.) As of February, 2009, the Game had
20
over 1.1 million daily active users. (Id.) As of July, 2009, the Game had more than 4 million daily
21
active users. (Id.) As of December, 2009, the Game had over 7 million daily active users. (Id.)
22
Zynga makes the Game available through social networking websites and applications (collectively
23
“Providers”), including but not limited to the Providers identified above. (Id. ¶ 8.)
24
Zynga owns or leases the computer servers that players must access in order to play the
25
Game. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 9.) Zynga grants players who participate in the Game a revocable license to
26
access its servers for the purpose of playing the Game. (Id.) Zynga’s Terms of Service govern
27
users’ play of the Game, and players who use the Game must consent to the Terms of Service. (Id. ¶
28
-2-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
10.) Players who use the Game in a manner not expressly authorized by Zynga, including without
2
limitation in violation of the Terms of Service, are not authorized to participate in the Game, or to
3
access Zynga’s servers. (Id. ¶ 11.)
4
When users sign up with Zynga to play the Game, they receive a certain amount of “Virtual
5
Currency” that they use to compete in the Game with other players using the Providers’ sites and/or
6
applications. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 12.) Players can increase their total amount of “Virtual Currency”
7
through their play, and can also purchase “Virtual Currency” from Zynga. Players use “Virtual
8
Currency” to purchase various virtual, in-Game digital items (“Virtual Goods”). (Id. ¶ 13.) Players
9
can also earn “Virtual Goods” by doing “jobs” and otherwise playing the Game. (Id.) Zynga grants
10
players a limited, revocable license to use the “Virtual Currency” or “Virtual Goods” while playing
11
the Game, but retains sole and exclusive ownership of the “Virtual Currency” or “Virtual Goods”
12
and the source code that allows the “Virtual Currency” or “Virtual Goods” to be used in the Game.
13
(Id. ¶ 14.) Zynga has not authorized any third party to sell the “Virtual Currency” or “Virtual
14
Goods” required to play the Game. (Id. ¶ 15.) Among other things, the Terms of Service that
15
govern users’ play of the Game prohibit users from selling “Virtual Currency” or “Virtual Goods”
16
for real-world money or otherwise exchanging “Virtual Currency” or “Virtual Goods” for anything
17
of value outside the Game. (Id. ¶ 16.)
18
Without Zynga’s authorization or approval, Defendants have created and currently operate
19
websites at the Internet domain names MAFIAWARSDIRECT.COM, MWBLACKMARKET.COM
20
and MWFEXPRESS.COM (the “Infringing Websites” or the “Domain Names”), possibly among
21
others. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 17.) Through the Infringing Websites, Defendants “sell” “Virtual Goods”
22
that users, playing the Game through the Providers’ websites and/or applications, can use to compete
23
with other players who obtained their “Virtual Goods” directly from Zynga. (Id. ¶ 18.) Defendants
24
advertise and “sell” these “Virtual Goods” using the MAFIA WARS Mark and/or confusingly
25
similar misspellings or variations of the MAFIA WARS Mark. (Id. ¶ 19.) Defendants “sell”
26
“Virtual Goods” for use in the Game for real-world money, and at prices that are substantially lower
27
than the prices paid by users who obtain their “Virtual Goods” from Zynga. (Id. ¶ 20.) Defendants
28
-3-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
have used the Game itself as part of their scheme, transferring the “Virtual Goods” they “sell” during
2
game play in contravention of the Game’s terms of service and/or security measures, and in violation
3
of the license they received from Zynga to participate in the Game. (Id. ¶ 21.) Zynga has never
4
authorized Defendants to use the Mark or to “sell” “Virtual Goods” for use in the Game, nor has
5
Zynga authorized Defendants to use the Game to transfer “Virtual Goods” that Defendants have
6
“sold” to players through the Infringing Websites. (Id. ¶ 22.)
7
B.
8
9
Third Parties with Information Regarding Defendants’ Identities and locations
Like many bad actors on the Internet, Defendants have taken one or more steps to conceal
their identities and locations, making it impossible for Zynga to identify, locate and serve them with
10
process without discovery. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 23.) However, because Defendants are operating an
11
online business, they can be traced through the legitimate companies that provide the services upon
12
which they rely. (Id. ¶ 24.) Zynga seeks authorization to issue subpoenas to these third parties for
13
information that will allow it to identify, locate and serve Defendants. The specific third parties
14
Zynga seeks authorization to subpoena are identified below, along with a brief discussion of the
15
relevance of each third party to Zynga’s investigation.
16
1. GoDaddy.com, Inc.
17
Defendants have contracted with Internet service provider GoDaddy.com, Inc. (“GoDaddy”)
18
for domain name registration services in connection with the Domain Names. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 25,
19
Exs. 1-3.) GoDaddy is likely to have contact and billing information that will help Zynga to identify
20
and locate Defendants. (Id. ¶ 25.) GoDaddy may also have information about other domain names
21
that Defendants have registered, which may provide additional clues as to their identities and
22
locations (for example if they maintain personal websites that provide additional, valid information
23
about their identities or locations, or about other third parties with whom they do business). (Id.)
24
2. Microsoft Office Live.
25
Defendants have contracted with Internet service provider Microsoft Office Live
26
(“Microsoft”) for website hosting services in connection with the Domain Names. (Hanley Decl. ¶
27
265, Exs. 4-6.) Microsoft is likely to have contact and billing information that will help Zynga to
28
-4-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
identify and locate Defendants. (Id. ¶ 26.) Microsoft may also have information about other domain
2
names that Defendants are hosting through Microsoft, which may provide additional clues as to their
3
identities and locations (for example if they maintain personal websites that provide additional, valid
4
information about their identities or locations, or about other third parties with whom they do
5
business). (Id.)
6
3. PayPal, Inc.
7
Defendants may have contracted with PayPal, Inc. to process payments for sales they made
8
through the Infringing Websites. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 27, Exs. 7-8.) PayPal identifies its customers’
9
accounts by one or more email addresses the customers provide when they establish their accounts.
10
(Id. ¶ 28.) Defendants used the email addresses mafiawarsblackmarket@gmail.com,
11
mwfexpress@gmail.com, mafiawarsdirect@gmail.com, jwilliams1980@ymail.com and
12
lmartini888@gmail.com to carry on business through the Infringing Websites. (Id. ¶ 29, Exs. 1-3, 8-
13
10.) Because Defendants used these email addresses to carry on their unlawful business, it is likely
14
that they established one or more PayPal accounts related to their business using any or all of these
15
email addresses. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 30.) PayPal is likely to have information regarding Defendants’
16
true identities and locations. (Id. ¶ 31.) Information obtained from PayPal is likely to be accurate
17
because Defendants rely on PayPal to provide them with the money their customers pay for the
18
“Virtual Goods” Defendants sell. (Id.)
19
20
III.
ARGUMENT
Zynga seeks leave of the Court to conduct limited discovery to determine the true identities
21
and locations of Defendants so that they can be served with legal process. The Ninth Circuit permits
22
discovery to determine the identity of unknown defendants. “Where the identity of alleged
23
defendants will not be known prior to the filing of a complaint[,] . . . the plaintiff should be given an
24
opportunity through discovery to identify the unknown defendants, unless it is clear that discovery
25
would not uncover the identities, or that the complaint would be dismissed on other grounds.”
26
Gillespie v. Civiletti, 629 F.2d 637, 642 (9th Cir. 1980); see also Wakefield v. Thompson, 177 F.3d
27
28
-5-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
1160, 1163 (9th Cir. 1999) (relying on Gillespie in reversing district court’s dismissal of Doe
2
complaint).
3
In Columbia Insurance Co. v. Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. 573 (N.D. Cal. 1999), this Court
4
outlined a four-part framework for a party’s motion for leave to conduct discovery to confirm the
5
identities and locations of “Doe” Defendants. Id. at 578-80. The Seescandy.com framework
6
requires that the moving party: (1) identify the Defendants with enough specificity to allow the
7
Court to determine whether the Defendants are a real person or entity who could be sued in federal
8
court; (2) recount the steps taken to locate the defendant; (3) show that its action could survive a
9
motion to dismiss; and (4) file a request for discovery with the Court identifying the persons or
10
entities on whom discovery process might be served. Id. Zynga seeks limited discovery in this case
11
pursuant to the Gillespie rule and the Seescandy.com framework, and respectfully asks the Court to
12
grant Zynga leave to conduct limited discovery to locate and identify Defendants.
13
A.
14
Defendants Are Real Persons or Entities
Under Seescandy.com, Zynga must first identify Defendants with sufficient specificity such
15
that the Court can determine that Defendants are real persons or entities that could be sued in federal
16
court. 185 F.R.D. at 578 (citing Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co., 556 F.2d 406, 430
17
n.24 (9th Cir. 1977)). Here, Defendants are individuals or entities who have created and operate the
18
Infringing Websites in violation of federal and state law. They can be identified through the various
19
third parties whose services they must obtain in order to operate their business. Defendants are
20
subject to suit in federal court as they have committed violations of federal law and violations of
21
state laws over which this Court has jurisdiction in this case.
22
B.
23
Zynga has Taken Steps to Identify Defendants
The second Seescandy.com requirement is that Zynga “identify all previous steps taken to
24
locate the elusive Defendants.” Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. at 579 (citing Plant v. Does, 19 F. Supp.
25
2d 1316, 1320 (S.D. Fla. 1998). To date, Zynga has undertaken significant efforts to discover
26
Defendants’ identities. (Hanley Decl. ¶ 32.) Since discovering the existence of the Infringing
27
Websites, Zynga has analyzed publicly-available information about the Infringing Websites and the
28
-6-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
Domain Names to identify the third parties who are likely to possess information that will allow it to
2
confirm Defendants’ identities and locations. (Id.) This has included examining information in the
3
public Whois Internet domain name database, analyzing the links to third party websites or
4
applications on the Infringing Websites identified in the Complaint, and examining the source code
5
of the Infringing Websites. (Id.) The types of third parties Zynga has identified through its analysis
6
generally will not or cannot disclose information for their customers without a subpoena or other
7
legal authorization. (Id. ¶ 33.)
8
9
Zynga unsuccessfully attempted to serve Defendants at the physical addresses listed for
Defendants in the Whois database information Domain History for the domain names
10
MWBLACKMARKET.COM and MWFEXPRESS.COM. (See Declaration of David K. Caplan
11
(“Caplan Decl.”) ¶¶ 2-4.) The physical address listed in the Whois database information for
12
MWBLACKMARKET.COM is not a home or business address for Defendants, but rather is a UPS
13
Depot from which cargo trucks and vans are dispatched. (See Caplan Decl. ¶ 2, Ex. 1.) The physical
14
address listed in the Whois database information for MWFEXPRESS.COM does not exist in the city
15
listed for the domain name. (See id. ¶ 3, Ex. 2.) The physical address listed in the Whois database
16
information for MAFIAWARSDIRECT.COM is for Indiana University East and the Whois database
17
address did not include a suite, dorm or office number necessary to locate a person or entity at the
18
University. (See id. ¶ 4-5, Exs. 3-4.)1
19
At this point, Zynga has largely exhausted the publicly-available information available to it
20
regarding Defendants and the Infringing Websites. (Id. ¶ 34.) Additional information that will allow
21
Zynga to identify, locate and serve Defendants will be available to Zynga only once it has Court
22
authorization to compel the production of such information through the service of subpoenas. (Id. ¶
23
35.)
24
//
25
//
26
27
1
Therefore, Zynga did not attempt to serve Defendants at this address.
28
-7-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
C.
2
Zynga’s Action can Withstand a Motion to Dismiss
The third Seescandy.com factor requires Zynga to establish, to the Court’s satisfaction, that
3
its action against Defendants can withstand a motion to dismiss. Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. at 579
4
(citing Gillespie, 629 F.2d at 642). More specifically, Zynga “must make some showing that an act
5
giving rise to civil liability actually occurred and that the discovery is aimed at revealing specific
6
identifying features of the person or entity who committed that act.” Id.
7
Zynga’s Action meets this requirement because Defendants have committed various
8
copyright violations and/or trademark and service mark violations, in addition to violations of other
9
state and federal laws, through their creation and operation of the publicly-available Infringing
10
Websites. Defendants have inappropriately used the Mark MAFIA WARS in their commercial
11
ventures. Discovery from the third-parties identified in Part II above is specifically aimed at
12
identifying Defendants using the existing business records of companies that have contracted with
13
Defendants in connection with their unlawful activities.
14
Zynga has thoroughly and sufficiently pled each and every one of its causes of action against
15
Defendants in the Complaint in this action, and has provided additional factual information
16
regarding its claims in support of this Motion. Zynga is confident that once it has identified and
17
served Defendants, it will succeed in proving Defendants’ liability for violations of the federal
18
Lanham Act, the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and of California statutory and common law, and
19
will be able to successfully oppose any motion to dismiss.
20
D.
21
Identify and Serve Defendants
22
Limited Discovery Directed Toward Specific Third Parties Will Likely Allow Zynga to
The final Seescandy.com factor requires Zynga to support its request for discovery with
23
reasons justifying the specific discovery requested, as well as identification of a limited number of
24
persons or entities on whom discovery process might be served. Seescandy.com, 185 F.R.D. at 580
25
(citing Gillespie, 629 F.2d at 642). Zynga must demonstrate that “there is a reasonable likelihood
26
that the discovery process will lead to identifying information about Defendants that would make
27
service of process possible.” Id.
28
-8-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
Zynga proposes to subpoena the above-described entities identified in Part II above for name
2
and contact information, billing records, website content, server logs (which, among other things, are
3
likely to contain Internet Protocol addresses that help to confirm Defendants’ locations), and
4
correspondence for Defendants. Such discovery will likely allow Zynga to identify and name
5
Defendants because Defendants are likely to have provided those entities with at least some accurate
6
information regarding their identities and locations. The contemporaneous issuing of subpoenas to
7
these different entities will help Zynga to determine whether the information it receives from any
8
one of these third parties is likely to be genuine, or if Defendants have sought to further conceal their
9
identity by providing these third parties with false, mismatched personal and billing information.
10
Zynga also recognizes that the entities it has identified to date may be only the first step in an
11
investigation that requires the issuance of follow-up subpoenas to identify Defendants’ true identity
12
and location. For example, Defendants may have used email addresses other than those to which
13
Zynga is aware to establish their PayPal accounts. While Defendants listed five different email
14
addresses in the public Whois Internet domain name database and on the web pages located at the
15
Domain Names, it is reasonable to believe that they have used other email addresses in connection
16
with the Domain Names to carry on their business. Therefore, if a subpoena to a third party Zynga
17
has already identified reveals that Defendants are using PayPal to pay for the third party’s services, a
18
follow-up subpoena to PayPal regarding the email address that Defendants used to issue and collect
19
PayPal payments will be likely to reveal reliable information about Defendants’ identity and
20
location.
21
Similarly, if a subpoena to a third party Zynga has already identified reveals that Defendants
22
are using additional information to which Zynga is currently unaware, follow-up subpoenas to online
23
service providers, payment processors, and other third parties, will be likely to reveal reliable
24
information about Defendants’ identity and location. In recognition of that fact, Zynga requests
25
authority to issue follow-up subpoenas, if necessary, on the leads provided by the subpoenaed
26
parties.
27
28
-9-
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
1
Allowing time for Zynga to analyze the information received from each subpoena it sends,
2
and to obtain leave to issue follow-up subpoenas, and assuming timely responses to its subpoenas,
3
Zynga expects that it will be able to complete third party discovery and undertake appropriate efforts
4
to perfect service on Defendants within 120 days of the date the Court authorizes Zynga to proceed
5
with third party discovery.
6
Finally, Zynga notes that the only accurate contact information for Defendants of which
7
Zynga is aware are the email addresses for the Domain Names listed in the public Whois Internet
8
domain name database and on the web pages located at the Domain Names. Accordingly, Zynga
9
respectfully requests that the Court confirm that email service of subpoenas to these addresses will
10
satisfy Zynga’s obligations under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45(b)(1).
11
12
IV.
CONCLUSION
For the foregoing reasons, Zynga respectfully requests an order authorizing it to conduct
13
third party discovery to identify, locate and serve Defendants. Zynga will provide any additional
14
information the Court may request regarding this Motion.
15
16
17
18
Dated: May 12, 2010
By:
/s/
David K. Caplan
Keats McFarland & Wilson LLP
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC.
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
- 10 -
CASE NO. CV-10:01022 JF (PVTx)
PLAINTIFF’ZYNGA GAME NETWORK INC’S MOTION
FOR LEAVE TO CONDUCT THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY
AND MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?