McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al

Filing 46

Memorandum in Opposition re 41 MOTION to Dismiss DEFENDANTS GOOGLE INC. AND HTC CORPORATION'S NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTIN TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF filed byMary McKinney. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Denying Defendant Google Inc's Motion to Dismiss)(Avila, Sara) (Filed on 8/25/2010)

Download PDF
McKinney v. Google, Inc. et al Doc. 46 At 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Milstein, Adelman & Kreger, LLP 2800 Donald Douglas Loop North Santa Monica, California 90405 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION MARY MCKINNEY, Individually and on behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. CASE NO: 5:10-cv-01177-JW CLASS ACTION [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT GOOGLE, INC'S MOTION TO DISMISS November 1, 2010 9:00 a.m. 8 Hon. James Ware 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 GOOGLE, INC., a Delaware Corporation; HTC CORP., a Delaware Corporation; and T- Date: MOBILE USA, INC., a Delaware Corporation. Time: Courtroom: Defendants. Judge: [PROPOSED] ORDER Having considered Defendant Google, Inc.'s Motion to dismiss, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby DENIES the motion. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ________________ _____________________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE THE HONORABLE JAMES S. WARE [PROPOSED] ORDER DENYING GOOGLE'S MOTION TO DISMISS Error! Unknown document property name. Dockets.Justia

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?