"In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation"

Filing 109

MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by David Gould, Mike Robertson. Motion Hearing set for 1/30/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Responses due by 1/3/2012. Replies due by 1/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Aschenbrener, Michael) (Filed on 12/20/2011) Modified on 1/3/2012 (sis, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 KASSRA P. NASSIRI (215405) (knassiri@nassiri-jung.com) CHARLES H. JUNG (217909) (cjung@nassiri-jung.com) NASSIRI & JUNG LLP 47 Kearny Street, Suite 700 San Francisco, California 94108 Telephone: (415) 762-3100 Facsimile: (415) 534-3200 MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER (277114) (mja@aschenbrenerlaw.com) ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C. 795 Folsom Street, First Floor San Francisco, California 94107 Telephone: (415) 813-6245 Facsimile: (415) 813-6246 ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 14 Case No. 10-cv-02389-JW 15 16 CLASS ACTION 17 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT, OR, ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT 18 19 IN RE: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION 20 21 22 23 Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. The 24 Court conducted a hearing on January 30, 2012. Based on the papers submitted to date and 25 oral argument, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. 26 27 28 [PROPOSED] ORDER 10-CV-2389-JW 1 Accordingly, Defendant Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ cause of action 2 brought under the Stored Communications Act is hereby denied. All of Plaintiffs’ remaining 3 causes of action remain dismissed with prejudice. 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 7 DATED: ____________________ 8 _______________________________________ HONORABLE JAMES WARE UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 10-CV-2389-JW [PROPOSED] ORDER 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?