"In Re: Facebook Privacy Litigation"
Filing
109
MOTION to Alter Judgment filed by David Gould, Mike Robertson. Motion Hearing set for 1/30/2012 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8, 19th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. James Ware. Responses due by 1/3/2012. Replies due by 1/10/2012. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Aschenbrener, Michael) (Filed on 12/20/2011) Modified on 1/3/2012 (sis, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
KASSRA P. NASSIRI (215405)
(knassiri@nassiri-jung.com)
CHARLES H. JUNG (217909)
(cjung@nassiri-jung.com)
NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
47 Kearny Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone:
(415) 762-3100
Facsimile:
(415) 534-3200
MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER (277114)
(mja@aschenbrenerlaw.com)
ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C.
795 Folsom Street, First Floor
San Francisco, California 94107
Telephone: (415) 813-6245
Facsimile: (415) 813-6246
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFFS AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
14
Case No. 10-cv-02389-JW
15
16
CLASS ACTION
17
[PROPOSED] ORDER
GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’
MOTION TO ALTER OR
AMEND JUDGMENT, OR,
ALTERNATIVELY, FOR RELIEF
FROM JUDGMENT
18
19
IN RE: FACEBOOK PRIVACY LITIGATION
20
21
22
23
Presently before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment. The
24
Court conducted a hearing on January 30, 2012. Based on the papers submitted to date and
25
oral argument, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Alter or Amend Judgment.
26
27
28
[PROPOSED] ORDER
10-CV-2389-JW
1
Accordingly, Defendant Facebook’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ cause of action
2
brought under the Stored Communications Act is hereby denied. All of Plaintiffs’ remaining
3
causes of action remain dismissed with prejudice.
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
7
DATED: ____________________
8
_______________________________________
HONORABLE JAMES WARE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CHIEF JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
10-CV-2389-JW
[PROPOSED] ORDER
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?