Perry v. Pido et al
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF UNSERVED DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SUSAN PIDO, et al.,
No. C 10-2548 LHK (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a fourth amended civil rights complaint
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 28, 2011, the Court advised Plaintiff that it was his
responsibility to provide the information necessary to locate Defendants Susan Pido and Doctor
Daniel Jardini. The Court directed Plaintiff to provide sufficient information to effectuate
service within thirty days, or face dismissal of Defendants Pido and Jardini. See Fed. R. Civ. P.
4(m). More than thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not provided any information
regarding the location of Defendants Pido or Jardini, nor has he demonstrated “good cause” for
such failure. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1421-22 (9th Cir. 1994).
Accordingly, Defendants Pido and Jardini are DISMISSED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
Order of Dismissal of Unserved Defendants
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?