Perry v. Pido et al

Filing 37

ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF UNSERVED DEFENDANTS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 6/7/11. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/7/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GREGORY PERRY, 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. 13 SUSAN PIDO, et al., 14 Defendant. 15 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-2548 LHK (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF UNSERVED DEFENDANTS Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a fourth amended civil rights complaint 17 pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On April 28, 2011, the Court advised Plaintiff that it was his 18 responsibility to provide the information necessary to locate Defendants Susan Pido and Doctor 19 Daniel Jardini. The Court directed Plaintiff to provide sufficient information to effectuate 20 service within thirty days, or face dismissal of Defendants Pido and Jardini. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21 4(m). More than thirty days have passed, and Plaintiff has not provided any information 22 regarding the location of Defendants Pido or Jardini, nor has he demonstrated “good cause” for 23 such failure. See Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1421-22 (9th Cir. 1994). 24 Accordingly, Defendants Pido and Jardini are DISMISSED without prejudice. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: 6/7/11 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 Order of Dismissal of Unserved Defendants P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.10\Perry548.4mdis.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?