Baker v. County of Santa Cruz

Filing 58

STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal with Prejudice re 57 Stipulation filed by County of Santa Cruz. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/3/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)

Download PDF
S 7 ER R NIA FO a LI Attorneys for Defendant County of Santa Cruz J . D av i l H 6 RT 5 d w a rd J u d ge E ERED A 4 UNIT ED 3 RT U O 2 DANA McRAE, State Bar No. 142231 County Counsel, County of Santa Cruz JESSICA C. ESPINOZA, State Bar No. 235941 Assistant County Counsel 701 Ocean Street, Room 505 Santa Cruz, California 95060 Telephone: (831) 454-2068 Fax: (831) 454-2115 O ORD IT IS S NO 1 S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 RICHARD BAKER, Case No. 10-03925 EJD 11 12 Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)) v. 13 14 15 16 COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, a political subdivision of the State of California and, DOES 1 - 25, Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff Richard Baker hereby dismisses with prejudice this entire action, including all 19 claims therein. The parties are responsible for their own attorney fees and costs resulting from this 20 litigation. The Clerk shall close this file 21 Dated: January 2, 2012 By: Dated: January 2, 2012 DANA McRAE, COUNTY COUNSEL 22 /S/ RICHARD BAKER Plaintiff In Pro Per 23 24 25 By: 26 27 28 Baker v. County of Santa Cruz, et. al., Case No. 10-03925 EJD /S/ JESSICA C. ESPINOZA Assistant County Counsel Attorneys for Defendant County of Santa Cruz Stipulation For Dismissal -1- PROOF OF SERVICE 1 2 I, the undersigned, state that I am a citizen of the United States and employed in the County 3 of Santa Cruz, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action. 4 My business address is 701 Ocean Street, Room 505, Santa Cruz, California 95060. On the date set 5 out below, I served a true copy of the following on the person(s)/entity(ies) listed below: 6 7 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii)) 8  by service by mail by placing said copy enclosed in a sealed envelope and depositing the sealed envelope with the United States Postal Service with the postage fully prepaid. 9 12 X ◇ by service by mail by placing said copy enclosed in a sealed envelope and placing the envelope for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with postage fully prepaid. 13  by personal service at a.m./p.m. at ___________________________________. 14  by express or overnight mail by depositing a copy in a post office, mailbox, sub-post office, substation, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service for receipt of express mail or a mailbox, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by an overnight mail company, in a sealed envelope, with express mail postage paid addressed to the below listed person(s). 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25  by express or overnight mail by arranging for pick-up by an employee of an express/overnight mail company on:  by facsimile service at the number listed below and have confirmation that it was received by: Richard Baker 26028 Highland Way Los Gatos, CA 95033 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January 2, 2012 at Santa Cruz, California. ______/S/________________ MARIA VARGAS 26 27 28 Baker v. County of Santa Cruz, et. al., Case No. 10-03925 EJD Stipulation For Dismissal -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?