Baker v. County of Santa Cruz
Filing
58
STIPULATION AND ORDER Granting Dismissal with Prejudice re 57 Stipulation filed by County of Santa Cruz. The Clerk shall close this file. ***ALL Deadlines terminated. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/3/2013. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/3/2013)
S
7
ER
R NIA
FO
a
LI
Attorneys for Defendant County
of Santa Cruz
J . D av i l
H
6
RT
5
d w a rd
J u d ge E
ERED
A
4
UNIT
ED
3
RT
U
O
2
DANA McRAE, State Bar No. 142231
County Counsel, County of Santa Cruz
JESSICA C. ESPINOZA, State Bar No. 235941
Assistant County Counsel
701 Ocean Street, Room 505
Santa Cruz, California 95060
Telephone: (831) 454-2068
Fax: (831) 454-2115
O ORD
IT IS S
NO
1
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
N
D IS T IC T
R
OF
C
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
RICHARD BAKER,
Case No. 10-03925 EJD
11
12
Plaintiff,
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE
(FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii))
v.
13
14
15
16
COUNTY OF SANTA CRUZ, a political
subdivision of the State of California and, DOES
1 - 25,
Defendants.
17
18
Plaintiff Richard Baker hereby dismisses with prejudice this entire action, including all
19
claims therein. The parties are responsible for their own attorney fees and costs resulting from this
20
litigation. The Clerk shall close this file
21
Dated: January 2, 2012
By:
Dated: January 2, 2012
DANA McRAE, COUNTY COUNSEL
22
/S/
RICHARD BAKER
Plaintiff In Pro Per
23
24
25
By:
26
27
28
Baker v. County of Santa Cruz, et. al., Case No. 10-03925 EJD
/S/
JESSICA C. ESPINOZA
Assistant County Counsel
Attorneys for Defendant County of
Santa Cruz
Stipulation For Dismissal
-1-
PROOF OF SERVICE
1
2
I, the undersigned, state that I am a citizen of the United States and employed in the County
3
of Santa Cruz, State of California. I am over the age of 18 years and not a party to the within action.
4
My business address is 701 Ocean Street, Room 505, Santa Cruz, California 95060. On the date set
5
out below, I served a true copy of the following on the person(s)/entity(ies) listed below:
6
7
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
COMPLAINT WITH PREJUDICE (FRCP 41(a)(1)(ii))
8
by service by mail by placing said copy enclosed in a sealed envelope and depositing the sealed
envelope with the United States Postal Service with the postage fully prepaid.
9
12
X
◇ by service by mail by placing said copy enclosed in a sealed envelope and placing the envelope
for collection and mailing on the date and at the place shown below following our ordinary business
practices. I am readily familiar with this business's practice for collecting and processing
correspondence for mailing. On the same day that correspondence is placed for collection and
mailing, it is deposited in the ordinary course of business with the United States Postal Service with
postage fully prepaid.
13
by personal service at a.m./p.m. at ___________________________________.
14
by express or overnight mail by depositing a copy in a post office, mailbox, sub-post office,
substation, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by the United States Postal Service
for receipt of express mail or a mailbox, mail chute, or other like facility regularly maintained by an
overnight mail company, in a sealed envelope, with express mail postage paid addressed to the
below listed person(s).
10
11
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
by express or overnight mail by arranging for pick-up by an employee of an express/overnight
mail company on:
by facsimile service at the number listed below and have confirmation that it was received by:
Richard Baker
26028 Highland Way
Los Gatos, CA 95033
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on January
2, 2012 at Santa Cruz, California.
______/S/________________
MARIA VARGAS
26
27
28
Baker v. County of Santa Cruz, et. al., Case No. 10-03925 EJD
Stipulation For Dismissal
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?