Gaston v. Hedgepeth
Filing
27
ORDER DIRECTING PETITIONER TO FILE RESPONSE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 5/30/12. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/1/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
ANTHONY GASTON,
11
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
ANTHONY HEDGEPETH, Warden,
14
Respondent.
15
16
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 10-4068 LHK (PR)
ORDER DIRECTING
PETITIONER TO FILE
RESPONSE
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
17
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254. On November 9, 2011, the Court dismissed Claim 1 as
18
procedurally barred and untimely. The Court then ordered Respondent to show cause why Claim
19
2 of the petition should not be granted. On January 5, 2012, Respondent filed a motion to
20
dismiss Claim 2 of the petition because it was untimely and failed to state a cognizable claim for
21
habeas relief. Petitioner filed an opposition. Respondent filed a reply, which added a new
22
argument that Claim 2 failed to state a due process claim. Because Petitioner has not had an
23
opportunity to respond to this new argument, the Court directs Petitioner to file a supplemental
24
opposition within twenty-eight (28) days of the filing date of this order. If Respondent wishes
25
to file a supplemental reply, he shall do so within fourteen (14) days thereafter.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: 5/30/12
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
Order Directing Petitioner to File Response
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\HC.10\Gaston068Presp.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?