Soto v. Henessy et al

Filing 11

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 10 Motion extension of time to file answer and dispositive motion (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/11/2011)

Download PDF
Soto v. Henessy et al Doc. 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se prisoner complaint under 42 U.S.C. 17 1983. Before the Court is Defendant's motion for order postponing deadline for filing of 18 answer and dispositive motion which the court construes as a motion for extension of time. 19 Because it appears no party would be prejudiced by an extension, Defendant's motion is 20 GRANTED. Defendant shall file his answer on or before March 25, 2011, and shall file his 21 dispositive motion on or before May 27, 2011. Plaintiff shall file his opposition to Defendant's 22 motion within thirty (30) days. Defendants shall file their reply fifteen (15) days from 23 Plaintiff's opposition. 24 This order terminates docket no. 10. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: 3/11/11 27 28 Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer and Dispositive Motion P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.10\Soto072eot-dm-answer.wpd DAVID G. SOTO, Plaintiff, v. DEPUTY JONES, BADGE #1607, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 10-4072 LHK (PR) ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE ANSWER AND DISPOSITIVE MOTION LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?