Grant et al v. Chase Bank

Filing 10

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE. Signed by Judge Koh on 11/10/2010. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of mailing)(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2010)

Grant et al v. Chase Bank

Doc. 10

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dated: November 10, 2010 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge EDWARD & ROBIN GRANT, v. CHASE BANK, Defendant. Plaintiffs, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 10-CV-04788-LHK ORDER VACATING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

The Court previously denied Plaintiffs' motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) without prejudice on grounds that Plaintiffs failed to provide notice to Defendant or demonstrate that a TRO should be issued without notice pursuant to Federal Rule 65(b). Order Denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order, ECF No. 9. The Court stated that if Plaintiffs wished to renew their TRO motion with notice to Defendant, they must serve Defendant and file proof of service with the Court on or before November 3, 2010. The Court further set a briefing schedule and hearing date to be followed in the event that Plaintiffs served Defendant. As of this date, Plaintiffs have not filed any proof of service with the Court. Accordingly, the briefing schedule and hearing date provided in the Court's previous order are VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Case No.: 10-CV-04788-LHK ORDER VACATING HEARING AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE
Dockets.Justia.com