In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation

Filing 48

MOTION to Relate Case (Administrative) filed by Paloma Gaos. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order & Stipulation)(Aschenbrener, Michael) (Filed on 3/20/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

KASSRA P. NASSIRI (215405)
([e-mail])
CHARLES H. JUNG (217909)
([e-mail])
NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
47 Kearny Street, Suite 700
San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER
([e-mail]) (277114)
ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C.
795 Folsom Street, First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94107
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

10
11

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

13

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

14

SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17
18

PALOMA GAOS and ANTHONY ITALIANO,
individually and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,

19
20
21
22
23

Case No. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD
CLASS ACTION

Plaintiffs,
v.
GOOGLE INC., a Delaware Corporation,
Defendant.

24

STIPULATION AND
[PROPOSED] ORDER
RELATING CASES
Date:
Time:
Place:
Judge:

Courtroom 1, 5th Floor
Hon. Edward J. Davila

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RELATING CASES

10-CV-4809-EJD

1
2

Pursuant to Local Rule 7-12, Plaintiffs and Defendant hereby stipulate and agree as
follows:

3

1.

Gaos v. Google, Case No. 10-cv-4809-EJD was filed on October 25, 2010.

4

2.

Priyev v. Google, Case No. 13-cv-0093-LHK was filed on February 29, 2012 in

5

the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, and transferred to this district on

6

January 8, 2013.

7

3.

For the reasons set forth in Plaintiffs Gaos and Italiano’s Administrative Motion

8

to Consider Whether Cases Should Be Related, the Gaos and Priyev matters should be related

9

cases under Civil Local Rule 3-12.
Respectfully submitted,

10
11

Date: March 20, 2013

12

By: s/ Kassra P. Nassiri
Kassra P. Nassiri
Counsel for Plaintiffs Gaos & Italiano

13
14
15

Date: March 20, 2013

ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C.
By: s/ Michael Aschenbrener
Michael Aschenbrener
Counsel for Plaintiffs Gaos & Italiano

16
17
18

NASSIRI & JUNG LLP

Date: March 20, 2013

19

PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP LLC
By: s/ Ilan Chorowsky
Ilan Chorowsky
Counsel for Plaintiff Priyev

20
21
22
23

Date: March 20, 2013

24

O’MELVENY & MYERS LLP
By: s/ Randall W. Edwards
Randall W. Edwards
Counsel for Defendant Google in Gaos

25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RELATING CASES

1

10-cv-4809-EJD

1

Date: March 20, 2013

MAYER BROWN LLP
By: s/ Edward D. Johnson
Edward D. Johnson
Counsel for Defendant Google in Priyev

2
3
4
5

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7
8

Dated: ______________________

9
10

__________________________________________
HON. EDWARD J. DAVILA
U.S. District Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RELATING CASES

2

10-cv-4809-EJD