In re Google Referrer Header Privacy Litigation

Filing 72

MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages (Administrative) filed by Paloma Gaos. (Attachments: #1 Signature Page (Declarations/Stipulations), #2 Proposed Order)(Aschenbrener, Michael) (Filed on 8/20/2014)

1 KASSRA P. NASSIRI (215405)
([e-mail])
2 NASSIRI & JUNG LLP
47 Kearny Street, Suite 700
3 San Francisco, California 94108
Telephone: [phone]
4 Facsimile: [phone]
5 MICHAEL J. ASCHENBRENER (277114)
([e-mail])
6 ASCHENBRENER LAW, P.C.
795 Folsom Street, First Floor
7 San Francisco, CA 94107
Telephone: [phone]
8 Facsimile: [phone]
9

ILAN CHOROWSKY (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
10 ([e-mail])
PROGRESSIVE LAW GROUP, LLC
11 1 N LaSalle Street, Suite 2255
Chicago, IL 60602
12 Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
13
14
15
16
17

Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Putative Class
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19

In re GOOGLE REFERRER HEADER PRIVACY
20 LITIGATION
21

CLASS ACTION

25

STIPULATION TO FILE AN
OVERSIZED REPLY
MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT
OF MOTION FOR FINAL
APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION
SETTLEMENT AND AWARD OF
ATTORNEYS’ FEES, EXPENSES,
AND INCENTIVE AWARD

26

Hon. Edward J. Davila

22
23

_______________________________________

Case No. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD

This Document Relates To: All Actions

24

27
28
STIPULATION TO FILE AN OVERSIZED
MEMORANDUM

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD

1

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ Reply Brief in Support of their Motion for Final Approval of Class

2 Action Settlement and Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses, and Incentive Award is
3 due on August 22, 2014;
4

WHEREAS, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-4(b), absent an Order from the Court, Plaintiffs’

5 Reply Brief would be limited to fifteen (15) pages in length;
6

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs in good faith believe that a Reply brief, which responds to each of

7 the objections voiced by four (4) objections briefs to the Parties’ Settlement in this matter, in
8 excess of fifteen (15) pages will be necessary to fully and effectively set forth their arguments;
9

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs’ counsel has spoken with Defendant’s counsel and, Defendant’s

10 counsel has no objection to Plaintiffs Filing a Reply Brief in Support of their Motion for Final
11 Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Expenses, and
12 Incentive Award in excess of fifteen (15) pages and up to twenty-five (25) pages.
13

THEREFORE IT IS STIPULATED by the Parties hereto, through their attorneys of

14 record, pursuant to Civil L.R. 7-11 and 7-12, that Plaintiffs may file a Reply Brief in Support of
15 their Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Award of Attorneys’
16 Fees, Expenses, and Incentive Awards up to twenty-five (25) pages in length.
17 IT IS SO STIPULATED
18
19 Dated: August 20, 2014

Dated: August 20, 2014

20
s/ Michael Aschenbrener
21 MICHAEL ASCHENBRENER (277114)
Aschenbrener Law, P.C.
22 795 Folsom Street, First Floor
San Francisco, CA 94107
23 Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
24

s/ Randall W. Edwards
RANDALL W. EDWARDS (179053)
O’Melveny & Myers LLP
Two Embarcadero Center, 28th Floor
San Francisco, CA 941111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

25 On behalf of Attorneys of Plaintiffs and the Class On behalf of Attorneys for Defendant
GOOGLE
26
27
28
STIPULATION TO FILE AN OVERSIZED
MEMORANDUM

1

CASE NO. 5:10-cv-04809-EJD