Treglia v. Sayre et al
Filing
19
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000)
randrada@andradalaw.com
VALERIE LY (SBN 270425)
vly@andradalaw.com
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225
Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: (510) 287-4160
Fax: (510) 287-4161
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendants
MICHAEL SAYRE, M.D.; GREG LEWIS;
NANCY ADAM, M.D.; STEVE NAKAMURA; CLAIRE WILLIAMS, M.D.;
STELLA PENKIAN; JAMES CIPOLLA (SUED AS “SIPOLA”)
9
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
SAN JOSE DIVISION
13
15
16
17
Case No.: 5:10-cv-05502-LHK
DANIEL TREGLIA,
14
Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
v.
M. SAYRE, et al.
Defendants.
Action Filed: December 3, 2010
18
19
20
The Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Dispositive Motion by Defendants MICHAEL
21
SAYRE, M.D.; GREG LEWIS; NANCY ADAM, M.D.; STEVE NAKAMURA; CLAIRE
22
WILLIAMS, M.D.; STELLA PENKIAN; JAMES CIPOLLA and all related pleadings were
23
24
submitted to this Court. The Court, having read and considered the motion and related papers in this
matter, and all other matters presented to the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby
25
26
GRANTS the motion and makes the following an Order of this Court:
27
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other
28
dispositive motion no later than ninety (90) days after this motion is granted. The motion shall be
1
{00072948.DOC/}DOC 0949
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
Treglia v. Sayre, et al.
5:10-cv-05502-LHK
1
supported by adequate factual documentation and, if applicable, shall conform in all respects to
2
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. If Defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be
3
resolved by dispositive motion, she shall so inform the Court prior to the date the motion is due. All
4
papers filed with the Court shall be promptly served on Plaintiff.
5
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be
6
filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later than thirty (30) days after the date on which
7
Defendants’ motion is filed. Plaintiff is referred to the Court’s Order of Service filed January 31,
8
2011, at Docket No. 4, regarding summary judgment.
9
10
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
11
12
13
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed no later than fifteen
(15) days after the date Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply
brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
14
15
Dated: 5/10/11
16
___________________________________
HON. LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
{00072948.DOC/}DOC 0949
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
Treglia v. Sayre, et al.
5:10-cv-05502-LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?