Treglia v. Sayre et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000) VALERIE LY (SBN 270425) ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION 180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225 Oakland, California 94612 Tel.: (510) 287-4160 Fax: (510) 287-4161 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendants MICHAEL SAYRE, M.D.; GREG LEWIS; NANCY ADAM, M.D.; STEVE NAKAMURA; CLAIRE WILLIAMS, M.D.; STELLA PENKIAN; JAMES CIPOLLA (SUED AS “SIPOLA”) 9 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN JOSE DIVISION 13 15 16 17 Case No.: 5:10-cv-05502-LHK DANIEL TREGLIA, 14 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER DISPOSITIVE MOTION v. M. SAYRE, et al. Defendants. Action Filed: December 3, 2010 18 19 20 The Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Dispositive Motion by Defendants MICHAEL 21 SAYRE, M.D.; GREG LEWIS; NANCY ADAM, M.D.; STEVE NAKAMURA; CLAIRE 22 WILLIAMS, M.D.; STELLA PENKIAN; JAMES CIPOLLA and all related pleadings were 23 24 submitted to this Court. The Court, having read and considered the motion and related papers in this matter, and all other matters presented to the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby 25 26 GRANTS the motion and makes the following an Order of this Court: 27 IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other 28 dispositive motion no later than ninety (90) days after this motion is granted. The motion shall be 1 {00072948.DOC/}DOC 0949 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION Treglia v. Sayre, et al. 5:10-cv-05502-LHK 1 supported by adequate factual documentation and, if applicable, shall conform in all respects to 2 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. If Defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be 3 resolved by dispositive motion, she shall so inform the Court prior to the date the motion is due. All 4 papers filed with the Court shall be promptly served on Plaintiff. 5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be 6 filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later than thirty (30) days after the date on which 7 Defendants’ motion is filed. Plaintiff is referred to the Court’s Order of Service filed January 31, 8 2011, at Docket No. 4, regarding summary judgment. 9 10 PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES 11 12 13 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed no later than fifteen (15) days after the date Plaintiff’s opposition is filed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date. IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 15 Dated: 5/10/11 16 ___________________________________ HON. LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 {00072948.DOC/}DOC 0949 [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION Treglia v. Sayre, et al. 5:10-cv-05502-LHK

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?