Treglia v. Sayre et al

Filing 19

ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 17 Motion for Extension of Time to File (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/10/2011)

1
2
3
4
5

J. RANDALL ANDRADA (SBN 70000)
[e-mail]
VALERIE LY (SBN 270425)
[e-mail]
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES
PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
180 Grand Avenue, Suite 225
Oakland, California 94612
Tel.: [phone]
Fax: [phone]

6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
MICHAEL SAYRE, M.D.; GREG LEWIS;
NANCY ADAM, M.D.; STEVE NAKAMURA; CLAIRE WILLIAMS, M.D.;
STELLA PENKIAN; JAMES CIPOLLA (SUED AS “SIPOLA”)

9

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11
ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13

15
16
17

Case No.: 5:10-cv-05502-LHK

DANIEL TREGLIA,

14

Plaintiff,
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO EXTEND
DEADLINE TO FILE MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR OTHER
DISPOSITIVE MOTION

v.
M. SAYRE, et al.
Defendants.

Action Filed: December 3, 2010

18
19
20

The Motion to Extend the Deadline to File Dispositive Motion by Defendants MICHAEL

21

SAYRE, M.D.; GREG LEWIS; NANCY ADAM, M.D.; STEVE NAKAMURA; CLAIRE

22

WILLIAMS, M.D.; STELLA PENKIAN; JAMES CIPOLLA and all related pleadings were

23
24

submitted to this Court. The Court, having read and considered the motion and related papers in this
matter, and all other matters presented to the Court, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby

25
26

GRANTS the motion and makes the following an Order of this Court:

27

IT IS ORDERED that Defendants shall file a motion for summary judgment or other

28

dispositive motion no later than ninety (90) days after this motion is granted. The motion shall be
1
{00072948.DOC/}DOC 0949

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

Treglia v. Sayre, et al.
5:10-cv-05502-LHK

1

supported by adequate factual documentation and, if applicable, shall conform in all respects to

2

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. If Defendants are of the opinion that this case cannot be

3

resolved by dispositive motion, she shall so inform the Court prior to the date the motion is due. All

4

papers filed with the Court shall be promptly served on Plaintiff.

5

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be

6

filed with the Court and served on Defendants no later than thirty (30) days after the date on which

7

Defendants’ motion is filed. Plaintiff is referred to the Court’s Order of Service filed January 31,

8

2011, at Docket No. 4, regarding summary judgment.

9
10

PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION

ANDRADA & ASSOCIATES

11
12
13

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed no later than fifteen
(15) days after the date Plaintiff’s opposition is filed.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply
brief is due. No hearing will be held on the motion unless the Court so orders at a later date.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

14
15

Dated: 5/10/11

16
___________________________________
HON. LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
{00072948.DOC/}DOC 0949

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION

Treglia v. Sayre, et al.
5:10-cv-05502-LHK