Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al

Filing 133

Proposed Order STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER by Admob, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Page Decl. In Support of Stipulation)(Page, Michael) (Filed on 6/3/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

DURIE TANGRI LLP
MICHAEL H. PAGE (SBN 154913)
[e-mail]
JOSEPH C. GRATZ (SBN 240676)
[e-mail]
GENEVIEVE P. ROSLOFF (SBN 258234)
[e-mail]
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
415-236-6300
Attorneys for Defendant
ADMOB, INC.

8
(Additional counsel listed on signature page)
9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15

In re iPhone Application Litigation

Case No.: 5:10-cv-05878-LHK (PSG)
STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING
SCHEDULE ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS
TO DISMISS AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND / CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878-LHK (PSG)

1

WHEREAS, by order dated May 31, 2011 (Dkt. No. 132), the Court ordered Defendants to file

2

any anticipated motions to dismiss the Consolidated Complaint by June 13, 2011, Plaintiffs to file an

3

opposition by July 11, 2011, Defendants to file a reply by July 25, 2011, and a set a hearing date of

4

September 1, 2011 for such motions;

5
6
7
8
9

WHEREAS, Defendants are endeavoring to coordinate the filing of consolidated motions to
dismiss rather than separate motions, for the convenience of the Court and all parties;
WHEREAS, in order to have time to coordinate and exchange drafts, Defendants have requested
that Plaintiffs agree to extend their time to file their motion to dismiss by one week;
WHEREAS, although Plaintiffs’ position is that scheduling was undertaken by the Court and

10

therefore can only be changed by the Court, Plaintiffs agree that there is value in a short extension that

11

may streamline the briefing so long as that extension does not materially delay the hearing of the motion;

12
13

THEREFORE, pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-2, and subject to the approval of this Court, the
parties, through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that:

14

1.

Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss shall be filed and served not later than June 20, 2011.

15

2.

Plaintiffs’ Oppositions shall be filed and served not later than July 25, 2011.

16

3.

Defendants’ Replies shall be filed and served not later than August 8, 2011.

17

4.

This stipulation will not impact any other dates already fixed by the Court.

18
19

Dated: June 3, 2011

DURIE TANGRI LLP

20
By:
21
22
23

/s/ Michael H. Page
MICHAEL H. PAGE
JOSEPH C. GRATZ
GENEVIEVE P. ROSLOFF
Attorneys for Defendant
ADMOB, INC.

24
25
26
27
28
1

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND / CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878-LHK (PSG)

1
2

HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Dated: June 3, 2011

By:

3

Michael L. Charlson (Bar No. 122125)
Maren J. Clouse (Bar No. 228726)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendants
APPLE INC. and QUATTRO WIRELESS,
INC.

9
10
11

/s/Michael L. Charlson
MICHAEL L. CHARLSON

Dated: June 3, 2011

GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP

12

By:

13

/s/ Gail E. Lees
GAIL E. LEES
GAIL E. LEES
S. ASHLIE BERINGER
JOSHUA A. JESSEN
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER LLP
1881 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18
19

Attorneys for Defendants
FLURRY, INC. and PINCH MEDIA, INC.

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND / CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878-LHK (PSG)

1

Dated: June 3, 2011

DLA PIPER LLP (US)

2
By:
3
4

LUANNE SACKS
CARTER W. OTT
DLA PIPER LLP (US)
555 Mission Street, Suite 2400
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8

Attorneys for Defendant
MOBCLIX, INC.

9
10

/s/ Carter W. Ott
CARTER W. OTT

Dated: June 3, 2011

COOLEY LLP

11
By:

12
13

MICHAEL G. RHODES
MATTHEWD. BROWN
COOLEY LLP
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, California 94111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]

14
15
16
17
18

Attorneys for Defendants ADMARVEL, INC
and MILLENNIAL MEDIA
INC.

19
20

/s/ Matthew D. Brown
MATTHEW D. BROWN

Dated: June 3, 2011

KAMBERLAW, LLC

21
By:

22

/s/ Scott A. Kamber
SCOTT A. KAMBER

23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND / CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878-LHK (PSG)

1

KAMBERLAW, LLC
Scott A. Kamber (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
DAVID A. STAMPLEY (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
100 Wall Street, 23rd Floor
New York, New York 10005
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2
3
4
5
6

KAMBERLAW, LLP
DEBORAH KRAVITZ (SBN 275661)
(N.D. Cal. admission pending)
[e-mail]
141 North St.
Healdsburg, California 95448
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

7
8
9
10

KAMBERLAW, LLP
AVI KREITENBERG (SBN 266571)
1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 601
Los Angeles, CA 90035
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13

Interim Class Counsel
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

14
15

FILER’S ATTESTATION

16
17

Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X (B) regarding signatures, I, Michael H. Page, attest

18

that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.

19

Dated: June 3, 2011

/s/ Michael H. Page
MICHAEL H. PAGE

20
*****

21
22

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED:

23
24
25
26
27

DATED:
__________________________________
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
United States District Court Judge

28
4
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND / CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878-LHK (PSG)

1
2
3
4
5

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I certify that all counsel of record are being served on June 3, 2011, with a copy of this document
via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the
foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 3, 2011, at San Francisco, California.

6
/s/ Michael H. Page
Michael H. Page

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
5

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND / CASE NO. 5:10-CV-05878-LHK (PSG)