Lalo v. Apple, Inc et al
Filing
151
MOTION to Relate Case ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO CONSIDER WHETHER CASES SHOULD BE RELATED filed by Apple, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B)(Charlson, Michael) (Filed on 7/18/2011)
EXHIBIT B
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Michael L. Charlson (Bar No. 122125)
Maren J. Clouse (Bar No. 228726)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
525 University Avenue, 4th Floor
Palo Alto, California 94301
Telephone:
(650) 463-4000
Facsimile:
(650) 463-4199
michael.charlson@hoganlovells.com
maren.clouse@hoganlovells.com
Christopher Wolf (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
Columbia Square
555 Thirteenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20004
Telephone:
(202) 637-5600
Facsimile:
(202) 637-5910
christopher.wolf@hoganlovells.com
Clayton C. James (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP
One Tabor Center, Suite 1500
1200 Seventeenth Street
Denver, Colorado 80202
Telephone:
(303) 899-7300
Facsimile:
(303) 899-7333
clay.james@hoganlovells.com
Attorneys for Defendant
APPLE INC., a California corporation
James F. McCabe (Bar No. 104686)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone:
(415) 268-7000
Facsimile:
(415) 268-7522
JMcCabe@mofo.com
Bryan Wilson (Bar No. 138842)
Teresa N. Burlison (Bar No. 230854)
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
755 Page Mill Road
Palo Alto, California 94304
Telephone:
(650) 813-5600
Facsimile:
(650) 494-0792
BWilson@mofo.com
TBurlison@mofo.com
16
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
17
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
18
SAN JOSE DIVISION
19
20
21
In re iPhone Application Litigation
Case No. CV-10-5878 LHK (PSG)
PROOF OF SERVICE
22
23
The Honorable Lucy H. Koh
24
25
26
27
28
PROOF OF SERVICE; Case No. CV 10-5878 LHK
1
2
3
4
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Michael Ewers, declare that I am over the age of eighteen years and I am not a party to
this action. My business address is 4 Embarcadero Center, 22nd Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111
On July 18, 2011, I served the following document(s):
5
6
7
Stipulation and Order Consolidating Cases; and Adopting Preliminary Case
Schedule, Except as Modified by the Court Herein (Dkt. No. 36)
8
Order Appointing Interim Plaintiffs’ Class Counsel and Executive Committee (Dkt.
No. 65)
9
Order Granting in Part Joint Stipulation to Extend Briefing Schedule (Dkt. No. 134)
10
11
12
13
14
15
on the interested parties in this action:
AMAMGBO & ASSOCIATES
Donald Chidi Amamgbo, Esq.
6167 Bristol Parkway, #325
Culver City, CA 90230
donald@amamgbo.com
Counsel for Plaintiff Eric Terrell
N.D. Cal., No. 3:11-cv-03416-JCS
Served via U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail
THE TERRELL LAW GROUP
Reginald Von Terrell, Esq.
P.O. Box 13315, PMB #148
Oakland, CA 94661
reggiet2@aol.com
Counsel for Plaintiff Eric Terrell
N.D. Cal., No. 3:11-cv-03416-JCS
Served via U.S. Mail and Electronic Mail
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
[X] BY MAIL: I am readily familiar with the business' practice for collection and processing
correspondence for mailing with the United States Postal Service. I know that the
correspondence was deposited with the United States Postal Service on the same day this
declaration was executed in the ordinary course of business. I know that the envelopes
were sealed, and with postage thereon fully prepaid, placed for collection and mailing on
this date, following ordinary business practices, in the United States mail at San Francisco,
California.
[ ] BY PERSONAL SERVICE: I caused the document(s) to be delivered by hand as indicated
on Service List.
[X] BY ELECTRONIC MAIL: I caused such document to be delivered by electronic mail to
the addresses(s) by electronic transmission.
24
25
26
I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the
foregoing is true and correct, that this declaration is executed on July 18, 2011, at San Francisco,
California; and that I am employed in the office of a member of the bar of this Court at whose
direction the service was made.
27
_______/s/_Michael Ewers_______________
Michael Ewers
28
-1-
PROOF OF SERVICE; Case No. CV 10-5878 LHK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?