Quiroz v. Cate et al
Filing
243
ORDER by Judge Lucy H. Koh granting 236 Motion to dismiss defendant Devan Hawkes (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service) (mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/26/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
MARK ROBERT QUIROZ,
11
12
13
14
15
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
ROBERT A. HOREL, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
___________________________________ )
No. C 11-0016 LHK (PR)
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION TO DISMISS DEFENDANT
DEVAN HAWKES
(Docket No. 236)
16
On July 16, 2013, plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a third amended civil
17
rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Upon screening, the court ordered it served upon
18
named defendants. (Docket No. 181.) On October 23, 2013, a summons was returned
19
unexecuted for defendant Devan Hawkes because he had “retired with no forwarding
20
information.” (Docket No. 202.) On December 18, 2013, the court directed plaintiff to file a
21
notice with the court containing a current and accurate address for defendant Devan Hawkes
22
such that the Marshal is able to effect service. (Docket No. 230.) On January 24, 2014, plaintiff
23
filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss defendant Devan Hawkes from this action. (Docket No.
24
236.)
25
26
Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. Defendant Devan Hawkes is DISMISSED without
prejudice. The clerk shall terminate said defendant from this action.
27
This order terminates docket number 236.
28
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
2/25/14
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Mot. to Dismiss Def. Devan Hawkes
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.11\Quiroz016dism-Hawkes.wpd
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order Granting Plaintiff’s Mot. to Dismiss Def. Devan Hawkes
P:\PRO-SE\LHK\CR.11\Quiroz016dism-Hawkes.wpd
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?