Tubbs v. San Francisco Public Works Dept. et al

Filing 4

ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 3/2/11. (Attachments: # 1 certificate of mailing)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/2/2011)

Download PDF
Tubbs v. San Francisco Public Works Dept. et al Doc. 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 TODD L. TUBBS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 13 14 15 On January 5, 2011, Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint, pursuant 16 to 42 U.S.C. 1983. That same day, the Clerk notified Plaintiff that he had not paid the filing 17 fee, nor had he filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis ("IFP"). Along with 18 the deficiency notice, Plaintiff was provided with a new IFP application and instructions for 19 completing it. Plaintiff was further cautioned that his failure to either file a completed IFP 20 application or pay the filing fee within thirty days would result in the dismissal of this action. To 21 date, Plaintiff has not complied. Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED without 22 prejudice to Plaintiff filing a new action in which he either pays the filing fee or files a 23 completed IFP application. The Clerk shall enter judgment and close the file. 24 IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 DATED: 26 27 28 Order of Dismissal P:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.11\Tubbs033disifp.wpd IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 11-0033 LHK (PR) ORDER OF DISMISSAL SAN FRANCISCO PUBLIC WORKS DEPT, et al., Defendants. 3/2/11 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?