Browning v. SunRun, et al

Filing 25

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. Response due by August 15, 2011, demonstrating why the case should not be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/15/2011. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/15/2011) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/15/2011: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
NO. 5:11-cv-00174 EJD

JOHNNY BROWNING,

11

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Plaintiff(s),
v.

For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
SUN RUN, et. al.,
13
Defendant(s).
14
15

/
On June 3, 2011, the Court set a case management conference in this action for July 15,

16

2011, at 10:00 a.m. Neither the plaintiff nor remaining defendant appeared at the appointed time for

17

the case management conference, nor did the Court receive a request for an extension of time or any

18

other excuse for the parties' failure to appear. It appears from a review of the docket that service has

19

not been effected on Defendant Solmentum because of failure to provide a proper address.

20

Accordingly, the Court hereby issues an order to show cause why this action should not be

21

dismissed for failure to prosecute. If plaintiff does not file a response to this order to show cause by

22

August 15, 2011, demonstrating why the case should not be dismissed, the Court will dismiss the

23

action with prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). No hearing will be held on

24

the order to show cause unless otherwise ordered by the Court.

25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: July 15, 2011
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge